Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kai Lord" data-source="post: 427173" data-attributes="member: 3570">Would I have included TWF with the Class if I had written it?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; For me allowing that Amb/TWF is just a byproduct of Rangers having heightened senses and fine-tuned gross motor skills is easier to accept in a flavor sense than the idea that they all specifically trained with a weapon in each hand at Ranger school.&nbsp; Since I've never played a Ranger who wielded two weapons its just something I've pretty much dismissed.And &quot;Summon Familiar&quot; is an ability EVERY Wizard has.&nbsp; That still doesn't make it their signature deal.&nbsp; Its not like people look at a Wizard and say &quot;hey its one of those magic chipmunk guys&quot;, even though every single one gets the perk for free.&nbsp; Its the same with Rangers.&nbsp; They aren't &quot;TWF guys&quot;, but they could be if they wanted to.Of course I recognize that FE's can be much less useful at times than WS.&nbsp; But they can also be MUCH greater.&nbsp; I never said the Ranger was a better all around warrior than a Fighter.&nbsp; But he can hold his own, and if archery is involved even eclipse the Fighter.He isn't the most powerful nor the weakest class, he's simply balanced.&nbsp; In some situations he'll throw down like no other class, and in others he'll be shown up by others.&nbsp; Just like all the classes.&nbsp; Except maybe the Monk...&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kai Lord, post: 427173, member: 3570"] Would I have included TWF with the Class if I had written it? No. For me allowing that Amb/TWF is just a byproduct of Rangers having heightened senses and fine-tuned gross motor skills is easier to accept in a flavor sense than the idea that they all specifically trained with a weapon in each hand at Ranger school. Since I've never played a Ranger who wielded two weapons its just something I've pretty much dismissed. And "Summon Familiar" is an ability EVERY Wizard has. That still doesn't make it their signature deal. Its not like people look at a Wizard and say "hey its one of those magic chipmunk guys", even though every single one gets the perk for free. Its the same with Rangers. They aren't "TWF guys", but they could be if they wanted to. Of course I recognize that FE's can be much less useful at times than WS. But they can also be MUCH greater. I never said the Ranger was a better all around warrior than a Fighter. But he can hold his own, and if archery is involved even eclipse the Fighter. He isn't the most powerful nor the weakest class, he's simply balanced. In some situations he'll throw down like no other class, and in others he'll be shown up by others. Just like all the classes. Except maybe the Monk... :cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification