Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's wrong with the single-classed Ranger?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wizardry" data-source="post: 427810" data-attributes="member: 8219"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Rangers</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In your experience, perhaps, but from what I've seen the complaints about the Ranger are more about their lack of flavor than any lack of power. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You seem to be complaining more about the flavor of the Ranger, here, given your "boring" statement. I'd agree the Ranger lacks flavor, but it certainly isn't lacking in power.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, from what I've seen of your post, it seems like you or the Ranger player expected to be a "star" in some way or another. In other words, you expected the Ranger to be a master combatant, or a great spell caster, and so on. The key to the Ranger is that the Ranger, like the Bard or the Monk, is that the Ranger is a supporting class. The Ranger can't fight quite as well as a Fighter or a Barbarian, but he's a great warrior nonetheless, and provides valuable support on the front lines.</p><p></p><p>The Ranger can't cast as well as a Wizard, Cleric or even Bard, but he has great supplemental spells that will aid a party substantially, again providing extra bonuses that would not be present if the Ranger was not a part of the group.</p><p></p><p>The Ranger can move silently and hide just as well, if not better, than a Rogue and given his great BAB, spells and HP, is arguably the best scout in the game. Even if you don't want to use the Ranger in this role, the Ranger is still a great supporter of the Rogue or Monk scout up in front. I can't tell you how valuable it really is to have two scouts covering each other in case of detection.</p><p></p><p>The Ranger does all of the above extremely well, and when you combine them into one whole, they become one of the most powerful classes in the game. The only time I've ever seen people have problems with Rangers is when they try to make them something they're not, and flat out ignore some of the abilities the Ranger has to offer in favor of one specific path. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Barbarians have Hide, Move Silently, and Spot? Damn! Thank you for informing me they possess three of the most valuable skills in the game. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> By the way, the Ranger hardly has "ok" skills. The Ranger has the third best skill list in the game, beaten only by Bards and Rogues. The spells they have are great supplementary bonuses to have, and they have d10 hps and BAB. If anything, the Ranger is one of the deepest core classes in the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wizardry, post: 427810, member: 8219"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Rangers[/b] [B][/b] In your experience, perhaps, but from what I've seen the complaints about the Ranger are more about their lack of flavor than any lack of power. [b][/b] You seem to be complaining more about the flavor of the Ranger, here, given your "boring" statement. I'd agree the Ranger lacks flavor, but it certainly isn't lacking in power. [b][/b] Okay, from what I've seen of your post, it seems like you or the Ranger player expected to be a "star" in some way or another. In other words, you expected the Ranger to be a master combatant, or a great spell caster, and so on. The key to the Ranger is that the Ranger, like the Bard or the Monk, is that the Ranger is a supporting class. The Ranger can't fight quite as well as a Fighter or a Barbarian, but he's a great warrior nonetheless, and provides valuable support on the front lines. The Ranger can't cast as well as a Wizard, Cleric or even Bard, but he has great supplemental spells that will aid a party substantially, again providing extra bonuses that would not be present if the Ranger was not a part of the group. The Ranger can move silently and hide just as well, if not better, than a Rogue and given his great BAB, spells and HP, is arguably the best scout in the game. Even if you don't want to use the Ranger in this role, the Ranger is still a great supporter of the Rogue or Monk scout up in front. I can't tell you how valuable it really is to have two scouts covering each other in case of detection. The Ranger does all of the above extremely well, and when you combine them into one whole, they become one of the most powerful classes in the game. The only time I've ever seen people have problems with Rangers is when they try to make them something they're not, and flat out ignore some of the abilities the Ranger has to offer in favor of one specific path. Barbarians have Hide, Move Silently, and Spot? Damn! Thank you for informing me they possess three of the most valuable skills in the game. :rolleyes: By the way, the Ranger hardly has "ok" skills. The Ranger has the third best skill list in the game, beaten only by Bards and Rogues. The spells they have are great supplementary bonuses to have, and they have d10 hps and BAB. If anything, the Ranger is one of the deepest core classes in the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's wrong with the single-classed Ranger?
Top