Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What's your 3.5e wishlist?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Quixote" data-source="post: 528993" data-attributes="member: 694"><p>No, no it isn't. The 1e ranger had a lot of... shall we say quirks... that didn't make it the best class in the world. For one thing, no stealth skills. The original ranger was best played in platemail. Another thing, the double hit dice at level 1, like the monk -- major rules inconsistency -- and the twin spell lists, arcane and divine. The 1e ranger was every ninja fan's dream. But at least it had a class focus: tracking, and goblin/giant-slaying. That's what a ranger is.</p><p></p><p>2e cleaned it up. d10 hit die, like the other fighers. Divine spells only, like the other fighters (meanwhile, the rogue group was arcane spells only in 2nd edition). And more importantly, they added Move Silently, Hide and Shadows, and Two-Weapon fighting, <em>when the ranger wore light armor.</em> These were three huge benefits available to the ranger who stuck to studded leather. Species enemy had been so nerfed in 2e that people seemed to forget that the ranger's prime focus is monster-slaying, and that woodcraft was a means to that end. But 2-weapon skill made sense if you knew anything about the 1e rules.</p><p></p><p>In 1st edition, like in 2nd edition, 2-weapon fighting was available to any warrior or rogue, at -2/-4 penalties, offset by your Dexterity bonus to ranged attacks. That meant that rangers, who required a Dex 15 and often had a higher score there, could often fight with 2 weapons at no penalty in 1st edition anyway. And since 1st edition allowed only daggers and hand axes as off-hand weapons, the ranger with his hunting knife and woodsman's hatchet was in gold. The fact that the 2e rules expanded two-weapon fighting to include same-size weapon pairs at a further -2/-2 was quite realistic; in 1st edition, only dark elves could carry two swords (when real-world human martial artists have been doing so with broadswords for centuries <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> ).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Quixote, post: 528993, member: 694"] No, no it isn't. The 1e ranger had a lot of... shall we say quirks... that didn't make it the best class in the world. For one thing, no stealth skills. The original ranger was best played in platemail. Another thing, the double hit dice at level 1, like the monk -- major rules inconsistency -- and the twin spell lists, arcane and divine. The 1e ranger was every ninja fan's dream. But at least it had a class focus: tracking, and goblin/giant-slaying. That's what a ranger is. 2e cleaned it up. d10 hit die, like the other fighers. Divine spells only, like the other fighters (meanwhile, the rogue group was arcane spells only in 2nd edition). And more importantly, they added Move Silently, Hide and Shadows, and Two-Weapon fighting, [i]when the ranger wore light armor.[/i] These were three huge benefits available to the ranger who stuck to studded leather. Species enemy had been so nerfed in 2e that people seemed to forget that the ranger's prime focus is monster-slaying, and that woodcraft was a means to that end. But 2-weapon skill made sense if you knew anything about the 1e rules. In 1st edition, like in 2nd edition, 2-weapon fighting was available to any warrior or rogue, at -2/-4 penalties, offset by your Dexterity bonus to ranged attacks. That meant that rangers, who required a Dex 15 and often had a higher score there, could often fight with 2 weapons at no penalty in 1st edition anyway. And since 1st edition allowed only daggers and hand axes as off-hand weapons, the ranger with his hunting knife and woodsman's hatchet was in gold. The fact that the 2e rules expanded two-weapon fighting to include same-size weapon pairs at a further -2/-2 was quite realistic; in 1st edition, only dark elves could carry two swords (when real-world human martial artists have been doing so with broadswords for centuries :rolleyes: ). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What's your 3.5e wishlist?
Top