Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's your favorite form of racial support?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ourchair" data-source="post: 5538057" data-attributes="member: 85362"><p>I prefer the original design - a race's nature is expanded by feats - than new stuff that muddles up with the old design, even though I think racial powers make a hell of a lot more design sense.</p><p></p><p>For one thing, the 'feat tax' made sense to me, because it balances the 'extreme' stuff unique to a race against more mundane races. For example, if Thri-Kreen want to be the crazy multi-arm monstrosities they were in 2E, a player has to give up some stuff. </p><p></p><p>The new idea of allowing all characters to define themselves according to powers (i.e. Do I choose a class power, a theme power or a racial power), but I'm only willing to accept that if they redesign all the other races along the same lines, which is something I doubt WotC can do in a timely fashion, as it took them a long while after HotFK and HotFL to add floating modifiers to the other races.</p><p></p><p>I love that WotC is constantly evolving and reconsidering their design ideas in the game, I just dislike how they either significantly affect the economy and value of power and feat choices before and how it can make character building with all the material since 4e launch very very difficult.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ourchair, post: 5538057, member: 85362"] I prefer the original design - a race's nature is expanded by feats - than new stuff that muddles up with the old design, even though I think racial powers make a hell of a lot more design sense. For one thing, the 'feat tax' made sense to me, because it balances the 'extreme' stuff unique to a race against more mundane races. For example, if Thri-Kreen want to be the crazy multi-arm monstrosities they were in 2E, a player has to give up some stuff. The new idea of allowing all characters to define themselves according to powers (i.e. Do I choose a class power, a theme power or a racial power), but I'm only willing to accept that if they redesign all the other races along the same lines, which is something I doubt WotC can do in a timely fashion, as it took them a long while after HotFK and HotFL to add floating modifiers to the other races. I love that WotC is constantly evolving and reconsidering their design ideas in the game, I just dislike how they either significantly affect the economy and value of power and feat choices before and how it can make character building with all the material since 4e launch very very difficult. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's your favorite form of racial support?
Top