Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's your favorite play style for your D&D games?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StarFyre" data-source="post: 5801637" data-attributes="member: 26055"><p>I would say high action/tactical-simulationist-actor driven.</p><p></p><p>haha <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> that may make no sense to some...but when it comes to setting/roleplaying, etc it is very simulationist. THink of it as a real world with fantasy layer on top. Regular people still exist in the Realms for example. If they jump off a cliff, they will still accelerate to gravity and smash into the ground, etc.</p><p></p><p>They still need to eat, sleep, etc. In that sense, the world is real. However, due to fantasy layer, there are special heroes, monsters, etc which are beyond normal people. The PCs fall into this category.</p><p></p><p>My players roleplay quite well; sometimes nearing to something i've seen in stage plays (several players have done Drama/stage stuff before). When it comes to combat; highly tactical and action. Action in the sense that, lots of stuff happening, even explosions, terrain deformation from spells, etc (ie. fireballs setting wooden buildings on fire, barbarians destroying columns in a temple bringing down the ceiling on a large hydra, etc). The tactical part comes from the general combat. If you've seen the start of Gladiator; that shield formation the roman's used (shields in front, then shields on top to make a roof). That tactic pretty much makes most ranged weapons useless unless you get a lucky shot (ie. a 20) or you hit with a siege weapon such as a trebuchet. That is how my players play. If they do that type of shield wall tactic, and orcs are firing arrows, then ya...i'll declare only a 20 will get through OR not even a 20 depending on the shield sizes/player sizes, etc. In combat, if one player trips an enemy, the others can jump on him to hold him down. if their str is just way too low for it to logically able to get up, he's down and can be beaten to a bloody pulp. If horses are charging, and the players + npcs raise a pike hedge (like in braveheart), ya, horses will have issues. So more like real world style tactics that make sense. Players found 4e 'tactical style' to be somewhat contrived and artificial. Hard to explain. Also if players can physically do something (considering that they are fantasy heroes) then forget the rules; go ahead and i'll find a simple 1 roll method to see if it works well or not (ie. a very strong player was rotating a metal block ona chain in a circle- i consider this like a 360 whirlwind attack that did half damage after the initial contact. Zombies that just walked into the radius were having their heads removed since the player is strong enough to do that. no reason to limit him to whirlwind attack or cleave; since this makes more sense. With his strength he could easily keep it going for 4 or 5 rounds; even more).</p><p></p><p>On top of this, we use armour as protecting the user as opposed to making it harder to make contact. If you get hit, the armour takes damage and some may get onto the being wearing the armour, etc. Weapons even cause various amounts of bleeding, etc. (our dark sun gladiator PC loves that!) <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> hehe</p><p></p><p>I also generally DM darker, more brutal games <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p>Of course, the most important thing is that players are having fun, so anything to allow them that is a go. I generally skip anything that takes more than 1 roll and turn it into 1 quick roll by me and let the players who what they did so they can continue happily <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Sanjay</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StarFyre, post: 5801637, member: 26055"] I would say high action/tactical-simulationist-actor driven. haha :) that may make no sense to some...but when it comes to setting/roleplaying, etc it is very simulationist. THink of it as a real world with fantasy layer on top. Regular people still exist in the Realms for example. If they jump off a cliff, they will still accelerate to gravity and smash into the ground, etc. They still need to eat, sleep, etc. In that sense, the world is real. However, due to fantasy layer, there are special heroes, monsters, etc which are beyond normal people. The PCs fall into this category. My players roleplay quite well; sometimes nearing to something i've seen in stage plays (several players have done Drama/stage stuff before). When it comes to combat; highly tactical and action. Action in the sense that, lots of stuff happening, even explosions, terrain deformation from spells, etc (ie. fireballs setting wooden buildings on fire, barbarians destroying columns in a temple bringing down the ceiling on a large hydra, etc). The tactical part comes from the general combat. If you've seen the start of Gladiator; that shield formation the roman's used (shields in front, then shields on top to make a roof). That tactic pretty much makes most ranged weapons useless unless you get a lucky shot (ie. a 20) or you hit with a siege weapon such as a trebuchet. That is how my players play. If they do that type of shield wall tactic, and orcs are firing arrows, then ya...i'll declare only a 20 will get through OR not even a 20 depending on the shield sizes/player sizes, etc. In combat, if one player trips an enemy, the others can jump on him to hold him down. if their str is just way too low for it to logically able to get up, he's down and can be beaten to a bloody pulp. If horses are charging, and the players + npcs raise a pike hedge (like in braveheart), ya, horses will have issues. So more like real world style tactics that make sense. Players found 4e 'tactical style' to be somewhat contrived and artificial. Hard to explain. Also if players can physically do something (considering that they are fantasy heroes) then forget the rules; go ahead and i'll find a simple 1 roll method to see if it works well or not (ie. a very strong player was rotating a metal block ona chain in a circle- i consider this like a 360 whirlwind attack that did half damage after the initial contact. Zombies that just walked into the radius were having their heads removed since the player is strong enough to do that. no reason to limit him to whirlwind attack or cleave; since this makes more sense. With his strength he could easily keep it going for 4 or 5 rounds; even more). On top of this, we use armour as protecting the user as opposed to making it harder to make contact. If you get hit, the armour takes damage and some may get onto the being wearing the armour, etc. Weapons even cause various amounts of bleeding, etc. (our dark sun gladiator PC loves that!) :) hehe I also generally DM darker, more brutal games :) Of course, the most important thing is that players are having fun, so anything to allow them that is a go. I generally skip anything that takes more than 1 roll and turn it into 1 quick roll by me and let the players who what they did so they can continue happily :) Sanjay [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's your favorite play style for your D&D games?
Top