Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What's your opinion of GURPS?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Conaill" data-source="post: 999243" data-attributes="member: 1264"><p>Guess I should have clarified that a bit more. As I already mentioned above, advantages in GURPS tend to be of an <em>innate</em> nature. Things like being a psychic, or being a mage, or being double-jointed. That's how I feel it <em>should</em> be.</p><p></p><p>When D&D decided to adopt the advantages/feats idea they messed it up IMHO, because they seriously blurred the line between innate talents and learned skills. For example, I don't think weapon proficiencies should be feats, because it's something you <em>learn</em> to use. You pick up a spiked chain one day, and you train with it. When you get good enough, it starts to become an effective weapon for you. And the more you use it and train with it, the better you become. Of course, you're probably neglecting your longsword training while you're doing this, so you may wind up being a master with the spiked chain, but you don't really advance in longsword.</p><p></p><p>Even worse, there are some feats which LIMIT what a character can do without those feats! That is what I was referring to above. For example, a regular chracter <em>cannot</em> hamstring an opponent if he doesn't have the appropriate feat. Or you <em>cannot</em> toss sand in someone's eyes because you don't have Dirty Fighting <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />. You <em>cannot</em> jump back after an attack unless you have Spring Attack. In Gurps, all of those would be acceptable maneuvers (with the possible exception of Spring Attack - because movement is much more fine-grained in GURPS), provided you make the attack penalties and/or some additional skill checks (with a high Acrobatics check, I might allow a Spring Attack type move even in GURPS).</p><p></p><p>The whole trained vs untrained skills is an entirely different matter. And one that IMHO GURPS deals with fairly realistically. No, I don't think any yokel should be allowed to try his hand at brain surgery. Nor do I think any yokel should have a small chance at being able to use psionics or magic without having the inborn ability. And I am quite happy with the way GURPS deals with this</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Conaill, post: 999243, member: 1264"] Guess I should have clarified that a bit more. As I already mentioned above, advantages in GURPS tend to be of an [i]innate[/i] nature. Things like being a psychic, or being a mage, or being double-jointed. That's how I feel it [i]should[/i] be. When D&D decided to adopt the advantages/feats idea they messed it up IMHO, because they seriously blurred the line between innate talents and learned skills. For example, I don't think weapon proficiencies should be feats, because it's something you [i]learn[/i] to use. You pick up a spiked chain one day, and you train with it. When you get good enough, it starts to become an effective weapon for you. And the more you use it and train with it, the better you become. Of course, you're probably neglecting your longsword training while you're doing this, so you may wind up being a master with the spiked chain, but you don't really advance in longsword. Even worse, there are some feats which LIMIT what a character can do without those feats! That is what I was referring to above. For example, a regular chracter [i]cannot[/i] hamstring an opponent if he doesn't have the appropriate feat. Or you [i]cannot[/i] toss sand in someone's eyes because you don't have Dirty Fighting :rolleyes:. You [i]cannot[/i] jump back after an attack unless you have Spring Attack. In Gurps, all of those would be acceptable maneuvers (with the possible exception of Spring Attack - because movement is much more fine-grained in GURPS), provided you make the attack penalties and/or some additional skill checks (with a high Acrobatics check, I might allow a Spring Attack type move even in GURPS). The whole trained vs untrained skills is an entirely different matter. And one that IMHO GURPS deals with fairly realistically. No, I don't think any yokel should be allowed to try his hand at brain surgery. Nor do I think any yokel should have a small chance at being able to use psionics or magic without having the inborn ability. And I am quite happy with the way GURPS deals with this [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What's your opinion of GURPS?
Top