NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="darkrose50" data-source="post: 6981670" data-attributes="member: 70793">Men can understand women and women can understand men.  I am surrounded by women.  Not all men are masculine, and not all women are feminine.  There are women with Myers Briggs Personality types of INTJ (the extreme logical thinker scientist and engineer stereotype), and there are men on the opposite stereotypical woman feeling stereotype (teachers and nurses).  Women TEND seek to communicate problems with others while troubleshooting a problem.  The primary goal is to retain a stable social role within the group.  Good for long term problem-solving (like identifying that we need to keep people happy in case we need them later).Men TEND to seek to fix the problem.  The primary goal is to fix the problem, and retaining a stable social role is not part of this problem solving.  Good for short term problem solving (like who needs to be punched, consequences be damned).Both methods of problem solving are valid, useful, evolutionary advantageous, and/or god given.Yet one can be a female with the  INTJ personality type (stereotypical male scientist or engineer).In fact among those with Asperger's Syndrome (~1/200 men, and ~1/900 women) this is common to have the INTJ (likely 50/100 folks with Asperger's Syndrome are INTJ, and in the general population ~1/100 INTJs are women, ~2/100 INTJs are men) engineer and mad scientist personality type.  Women with the mad scientist INTJ personality type, are quite often non-feminine, and are quite definitely women (many of them I consider to be quite attractive, as in holy cow, how can you be this seriously attractive . . . if I were single, then I would totally want to date these genius scientist girls as they have brains and beauty).</blockquote>

Verification