Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8771356" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>My problem is that that is the entire basis for the assumption. It's not logical. It doesn't make sense. It's just kind of neat. But these things are rarely that neat, and you couldn't do a proper playtest unless there was significant flex time, because you can't do each class once, for one month. Some classes will instantly have accepted changes, but others they may need to bring back. So it's too neat of an assumption. I will genuinely be shocked if it's anything that neat - and if it is, it proves the entire thing is kind of a sham, like they already know what they want to do, because of the lack of flex time.</p></blockquote><p></p>