Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Windjammer" data-source="post: 4521200" data-attributes="member: 60075">Psion, you see the button next to your name in this post? That will take you to the post the quote is from. Problem on EnWorld is that everytime I quote you, I miss out all the bits that were quotes in your post. (Beat's me why that should be so, but there it is.) Here is the post I was quoting from. It shows that you agree to someone else calling the RPGA influence on 4E to be a conspiracy theory.<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/243535-when-did-i-stop-being-wizards-coasts-target-audience-12.html#post4520332" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/243535-when-did-i-stop-being-wizards-coasts-target-audience-12.html#post4520332</a>People should be aware that the RPGA altered its principles since 4E was chartered, and in some respect made it more like non-tournament play. For instance, the DM is allowed to alter the CRs (hence monsters, traps, ...) of the encounters depending on how much the group is struggling with it. So (a) the influence of RPGA standards on 4E play at home isn't as ugly as it were if the RPGA would have kept their standards unaltered, and (b) everything I just said adds to the theory that RPGA play set a fundamental standard for how 4E was designed: WotC using 4E to bring tournament and home play (of D&amp;D) into closer proximity of each other.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Windjammer, post: 4521200, member: 60075"] Psion, you see the button next to your name in this post? That will take you to the post the quote is from. Problem on EnWorld is that everytime I quote you, I miss out all the bits that were quotes in your post. (Beat's me why that should be so, but there it is.) Here is the post I was quoting from. It shows that you agree to someone else calling the RPGA influence on 4E to be a conspiracy theory. [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/243535-when-did-i-stop-being-wizards-coasts-target-audience-12.html#post4520332[/URL] People should be aware that the RPGA altered its principles since 4E was chartered, and in some respect made it more like non-tournament play. For instance, the DM is allowed to alter the CRs (hence monsters, traps, ...) of the encounters [I]depending on how much the group is struggling with it[/I]. So (a) the influence of RPGA standards on 4E play at home isn't as ugly as it were if the RPGA would have kept their standards unaltered, and (b) everything I just said adds to the theory that RPGA play set a fundamental standard for how 4E was designed: WotC using 4E to bring tournament and home play (of D&D) into closer proximity of each other. [/QUOTE]

Verification