Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
When did mixing editions become unusual?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dessert Nomad" data-source="post: 7530059" data-attributes="member: 6976536"><p>For the benefit of anyone else reading this tedious argument: I haven't moved any goal posts. Celebrim made the statement that the repeated 20s, then 21 rule never came up in play (quoted above). I pointed out that it did come up in play, and that you'd get incorrect results if you didn't account for the fact that thief and magic user were on the second 20. (quoted above). Pointing out that his statement that I moved the goalposts is false is the only reason why I posted to this again, I don't really like it when people make false claims about me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If someone is using a procedure during play to account for the effects of a particular rule, then that rule came up in play in the way that I use language, as I said in my previous post. If you don't think that accounting for the effects of a rule means the rule came up in play, that's your language usage and nothing I say will change your mind about it, as I said in my previous post. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I've pointed out repeatedly, no one but you is talking about anyone attacking anything with an AC of 0 or better. Trying to puff yourself up by correcting' people about how few monsters had ACs better than 0 is ineffectual when you're the only one talking about ACs better than 0 and the person you're trying to 'correct' is explicitly talking about ACs of 1 and worse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dessert Nomad, post: 7530059, member: 6976536"] For the benefit of anyone else reading this tedious argument: I haven't moved any goal posts. Celebrim made the statement that the repeated 20s, then 21 rule never came up in play (quoted above). I pointed out that it did come up in play, and that you'd get incorrect results if you didn't account for the fact that thief and magic user were on the second 20. (quoted above). Pointing out that his statement that I moved the goalposts is false is the only reason why I posted to this again, I don't really like it when people make false claims about me. If someone is using a procedure during play to account for the effects of a particular rule, then that rule came up in play in the way that I use language, as I said in my previous post. If you don't think that accounting for the effects of a rule means the rule came up in play, that's your language usage and nothing I say will change your mind about it, as I said in my previous post. As I've pointed out repeatedly, no one but you is talking about anyone attacking anything with an AC of 0 or better. Trying to puff yourself up by correcting' people about how few monsters had ACs better than 0 is ineffectual when you're the only one talking about ACs better than 0 and the person you're trying to 'correct' is explicitly talking about ACs of 1 and worse. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
When did mixing editions become unusual?
Top