Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bloodtide" data-source="post: 5905545" data-attributes="member: 6684958">This might be more of others just looking at 4E with rose colored glasses and seeing with they want to see.&nbsp; The first line under fighters in the 4E players handbook says 'they protect the party'....they are defenders.&nbsp; Fighters are 'dangerous to ignore and can contain foes and keep them away from others.'&nbsp; That all does not sound like fighting to most people.&nbsp; For the record, it would say 'I fighter KILLS opponents' and 'it's dangerous to ignore a fighter as they will KILL you'.And then look at the fighter spells--&quot;I hitz the orc withz my ask and do&nbsp; W+(2)-H=** damagze! I'm the coolz inz kidz ever with my +w damagze....yea, yea, it's my birthdayz! Woo hoo Kidz D in D is sow in de housez and powned that orc! Woo hoo!&quot;This may be the worst, least convincing argument I see this week. It's also an extremely unimpressive bit of edition warring. No more, please. - Piratecat</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bloodtide, post: 5905545, member: 6684958"] This might be more of others just looking at 4E with rose colored glasses and seeing with they want to see. The first line under fighters in the 4E players handbook says 'they protect the party'....they are defenders. Fighters are 'dangerous to ignore and can contain foes and keep them away from others.' That all does not sound like fighting to most people. For the record, it would say 'I fighter KILLS opponents' and 'it's dangerous to ignore a fighter as they will KILL you'. And then look at the fighter spells--"I hitz the orc withz my ask and do W+(2)-H=** damagze! I'm the coolz inz kidz ever with my +w damagze....yea, yea, it's my birthdayz! Woo hoo Kidz D in D is sow in de housez and powned that orc! Woo hoo!" [color=red]This may be the worst, least convincing argument I see this week. It's also an extremely unimpressive bit of edition warring. No more, please. - Piratecat[/color] [/QUOTE]

Verification