Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
When did WotC D&D "Jump the Shark"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5533814" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>The biggest difference I see is that you are having a knee jerk reaction and not reading what is being said.</p><p></p><p>4E is NOT "failing".</p><p>DDI is making a very nice, steady stream of cash.</p><p></p><p>But the market is deeply split now. D&D as a brand could be doing vastly better than it is. </p><p></p><p>Again, we certainly don't know what WotC's goals were. It may very well be "failing" at that. But in a simple sideline observer sense, it is making money and not "failing". 4E detractors have said that in this very thread and I know I've said it very explicitly to you on more than one occasion. </p><p></p><p>Why are you unwilling to discuss the actual point instead of trying to misrepresent the other side?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I also wonder, since we have no evidence whatsoever, according to you, how can you even claim anything you just claimed?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have no memory of that statement from Erik and I rather doubt it was said by him with anything approaching the same certainty and expectation that you did.</p><p></p><p>wrong. Your protests notwithstanding, I'm looking at a lot of information and rather than putting everything in the "all informative" stack or "completely and fully without merit" stack, actually considering the context and value of the pieces. </p><p></p><p>There is a lot of purely meaningless anecdotal and useless information out there. And I throw that on the zero value stack just as you do. </p><p></p><p>I'm assessing what the the information we do have says. You were basically expressing emotional wishful thinking. It is not at all like what I'm doing now.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>OK</p><p></p><p>Strings of unsupported, obviously biased anecdotes do not lead to anything resembling an informed conclusion.</p><p></p><p>Happy? That is certainly a true statement. I agree with it 100%.</p><p></p><p>Now, try this one:</p><p></p><p>Useful information scattered amongst strings of unsupported, obviously biased anecdotes does not stop being useful.</p><p></p><p>Can you say that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5533814, member: 957"] The biggest difference I see is that you are having a knee jerk reaction and not reading what is being said. 4E is NOT "failing". DDI is making a very nice, steady stream of cash. But the market is deeply split now. D&D as a brand could be doing vastly better than it is. Again, we certainly don't know what WotC's goals were. It may very well be "failing" at that. But in a simple sideline observer sense, it is making money and not "failing". 4E detractors have said that in this very thread and I know I've said it very explicitly to you on more than one occasion. Why are you unwilling to discuss the actual point instead of trying to misrepresent the other side? I also wonder, since we have no evidence whatsoever, according to you, how can you even claim anything you just claimed? I have no memory of that statement from Erik and I rather doubt it was said by him with anything approaching the same certainty and expectation that you did. wrong. Your protests notwithstanding, I'm looking at a lot of information and rather than putting everything in the "all informative" stack or "completely and fully without merit" stack, actually considering the context and value of the pieces. There is a lot of purely meaningless anecdotal and useless information out there. And I throw that on the zero value stack just as you do. I'm assessing what the the information we do have says. You were basically expressing emotional wishful thinking. It is not at all like what I'm doing now. OK Strings of unsupported, obviously biased anecdotes do not lead to anything resembling an informed conclusion. Happy? That is certainly a true statement. I agree with it 100%. Now, try this one: Useful information scattered amongst strings of unsupported, obviously biased anecdotes does not stop being useful. Can you say that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
When did WotC D&D "Jump the Shark"?
Top