Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5537491" data-attributes="member: 957">Heh.&nbsp; Well, in fairness, I'm using a bit of a double standard on this myself.&nbsp; I *don't* think WotC should focus on getting lost fans back right now.&nbsp; Of course anything that grows the fans base is still the right move.&nbsp; But it would be easier to lose 4E fans than to recover people who have walked away from D&amp;D to embrace 4E.&nbsp; Don't throw good money after bad.I didn't even know about the change to CaGI.&nbsp; But I would agree that I saw many debates about it and typically it was anti-4E people pointing it out and pro-4E people defending.&nbsp; Now, clearly, there may have been far more massive arguments entirely within the 4E fanbase and I just missed those because I don't frequent those places.&nbsp; But Perm's comment does not suggest he saw anything different than I did.&nbsp; If they really did change because of anti-4E complaints, then that is a bad move and part of the schizophrenia I mentioned.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5537491, member: 957"] Heh. Well, in fairness, I'm using a bit of a double standard on this myself. I *don't* think WotC should focus on getting lost fans back right now. Of course anything that grows the fans base is still the right move. But it would be easier to lose 4E fans than to recover people who have walked away from D&D to embrace 4E. Don't throw good money after bad. I didn't even know about the change to CaGI. But I would agree that I saw many debates about it and typically it was anti-4E people pointing it out and pro-4E people defending. Now, clearly, there may have been far more massive arguments entirely within the 4E fanbase and I just missed those because I don't frequent those places. But Perm's comment does not suggest he saw anything different than I did. If they really did change because of anti-4E complaints, then that is a bad move and part of the schizophrenia I mentioned. [/QUOTE]

Verification