Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5539617" data-attributes="member: 957">You seem to be under some illusion that this is a court of law.But that aside, I've made my case.&nbsp; &quot;No it isn't&quot; fails to contradict that.That sounds suspiciously like a positive assertion....Yep. You have nothing to offer but don't like what the information says, so you are just muddying the water as much as you can.&nbsp;&nbsp; Ok, so in your own words you are stating that you don't know what &quot;in the ballpark&quot; means.&nbsp; Noted.And I have covered all of this.&nbsp; I even specifically discussed at least two other games besides PF and 4E.&nbsp; So now you are just demonstrating how disconnected your point if view is.But that's fine.&nbsp; &nbsp; The standard is not that I have to &quot;prove&quot; anything.&nbsp; The actual standard here is that I have to mystically force you to stop saying &quot;no it isn't&quot;.Obviously that is impossible.&nbsp; So you win.&nbsp; Congrats.In the mean time, reality will be over here.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5539617, member: 957"] You seem to be under some illusion that this is a court of law. But that aside, I've made my case. "No it isn't" fails to contradict that. That sounds suspiciously like a positive assertion.... Yep. You have nothing to offer but don't like what the information says, so you are just muddying the water as much as you can. Ok, so in your own words you are stating that you don't know what "in the ballpark" means. Noted. And I have covered all of this. I even specifically discussed at least two other games besides PF and 4E. So now you are just demonstrating how disconnected your point if view is. But that's fine. The standard is not that I have to "prove" anything. The actual standard here is that I have to mystically force you to stop saying "no it isn't". Obviously that is impossible. So you win. Congrats. In the mean time, reality will be over here. [/QUOTE]

Verification