Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
When did you enjoy 3.x?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N0Man" data-source="post: 4230394" data-attributes="member: 64066"><p>The truth is, 3E was a pretty big improvement over 2E, it's just that it was designed in such a way that a lot of flawed mechanics really began to shine through with time, and in certain circumstances.</p><p></p><p>They made skills matter more, instead of just being proficient or non-proficient, which was a nice step. However, the skill system could really get out of hand and create situations where difficulty levels would always be set up so that someone who didn't specialize in a skill had absolutely no chance of succeeding in something, or it was trivial to the person who did specialize. Saving throws were similar to skills in that regard (though I don't think that really changed a lot from 2E).</p><p></p><p>Wizards got an improvement in 3E, in the form of extra Level 0 spells, and allowing wizards equal ground with their Int bonus as clerics got with their Wisdom Bonus. However, when a Cleric runs out of spells, they still can wear Plate Armor, and they can still be more effective with a weapon. The wizard quickly became useless. Though to 3E's credit, they did give Wizard the option of crafting wands and scrolls so that they could still be useful (at the cost of XP), however since all classes leveled at the same rate, it wasn't like it was any worse than 2E's higher XP requirements for Wizards.</p><p></p><p>The former long-standing philosophy of D&D design was that Wizards should be very vulnerable to make up for their great power later. 4th Edition is the first edition to re-evaluate that and realize that the problem is that it makes being a caster at lower levels to be frustrating, and being anything other than a spellcaster at higher levels disappointing.</p><p></p><p>My biggest worry about 4E is that they may have taken the former versatility from the Magic User away. However, I have to remind myself how little anyone else had. Perhaps I must concede that it's for the best for everyone's fun to spread around abilities to the entire party.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N0Man, post: 4230394, member: 64066"] The truth is, 3E was a pretty big improvement over 2E, it's just that it was designed in such a way that a lot of flawed mechanics really began to shine through with time, and in certain circumstances. They made skills matter more, instead of just being proficient or non-proficient, which was a nice step. However, the skill system could really get out of hand and create situations where difficulty levels would always be set up so that someone who didn't specialize in a skill had absolutely no chance of succeeding in something, or it was trivial to the person who did specialize. Saving throws were similar to skills in that regard (though I don't think that really changed a lot from 2E). Wizards got an improvement in 3E, in the form of extra Level 0 spells, and allowing wizards equal ground with their Int bonus as clerics got with their Wisdom Bonus. However, when a Cleric runs out of spells, they still can wear Plate Armor, and they can still be more effective with a weapon. The wizard quickly became useless. Though to 3E's credit, they did give Wizard the option of crafting wands and scrolls so that they could still be useful (at the cost of XP), however since all classes leveled at the same rate, it wasn't like it was any worse than 2E's higher XP requirements for Wizards. The former long-standing philosophy of D&D design was that Wizards should be very vulnerable to make up for their great power later. 4th Edition is the first edition to re-evaluate that and realize that the problem is that it makes being a caster at lower levels to be frustrating, and being anything other than a spellcaster at higher levels disappointing. My biggest worry about 4E is that they may have taken the former versatility from the Magic User away. However, I have to remind myself how little anyone else had. Perhaps I must concede that it's for the best for everyone's fun to spread around abilities to the entire party. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
When did you enjoy 3.x?
Top