Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Njall" data-source="post: 4231178" data-attributes="member: 54719">I've owned my Cpu for quite a long time now. It's been 2 years since I upgraded it, and it's starting to feel outdated. It doesn't suck, but the day I upgrade it I won't be using it again, ever, 'cause I'll have something better to use. A game system isn't that different from a personal computer, for some people <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />If you assume that the above statement means &quot;my pc sucks&quot; you'd be wrong, 'cause I never implied that. My pc still works quite well nowadays, but it could be better.The promo stuff&nbsp; highlights the changes, and said changes were made for a reason. What should they do? Take the preview articles from what they didn't change because they felt it was fine as it was? They said that some aspects of the game weren't fun, in their opinion, or that they weren't fun enough.This doesn't mean &quot;the game sucks&quot;, it means &quot;we feel that the game is/was lackluster in some areas&quot;.And in 3.x some things were broken ( see polymorph, for example ), and they were aware of this even during the last years of 3.x ( see the PH2 for this specific matter ).Again, since their first goal was to make the game better in these respects, what else could they say? &quot;We felt that 3.x is the best system out there, but we'll change things for the sake of it and hope you buy it&quot;?Furthermore, some of them actually helped developing said system.They should be the ones that feel worse when someone criticizes the game...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Njall, post: 4231178, member: 54719"] I've owned my Cpu for quite a long time now. It's been 2 years since I upgraded it, and it's starting to feel outdated. It doesn't suck, but the day I upgrade it I won't be using it again, ever, 'cause I'll have something better to use. A game system isn't that different from a personal computer, for some people ;) If you assume that the above statement means "my pc sucks" you'd be wrong, 'cause I never implied that. My pc still works quite well nowadays, but it could be better. The promo stuff highlights the changes, and said changes were made for a reason. What should they do? Take the preview articles from what they didn't change because they felt it was fine as it was? They said that [b]some aspects[/b] of the game weren't fun, in their opinion, or that they weren't fun enough. This doesn't mean "the game sucks", it means "we feel that the game is/was lackluster in some areas". And in 3.x some things [b]were[/b] broken ( see polymorph, for example ), and they were aware of this even during the last years of 3.x ( see the PH2 for this specific matter ). Again, since their first goal was to make the game better in these respects, what else could they say? "We felt that 3.x is the best system out there, but we'll change things for the sake of it and hope you buy it"? Furthermore, some of them actually helped developing said system. They should be the ones that feel worse when someone criticizes the game... [/QUOTE]

Verification