Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
When did you enjoy 3.x?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Njall" data-source="post: 4232530" data-attributes="member: 54719"><p>Well, most children feel like they're neglected when they first have a brother. It doesn't mean they are. </p><p>WotC staffers like 4e, that's no surprise, considering they've come up with it, so they've probably done everything they could to make it as good as they think, and now they're telling us why they think they've improved the game. Unsurprisingly, they're using the best term of comparison they have: 3.x.</p><p>And why are they comparing it to 3e? Because 3.x is a solid game. </p><p>What would the merits of 4e be if 3.x sucked? </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, while this is a good question, I'd say that no, those problems were there even in core.</p><p></p><p>Polymorph: broken by itself, IMO, simply because most monsters were not assumed to be played as PCs in the first place. And sure, with splats it got even nastier.</p><p></p><p>The math, at higher levels, doesn't really work unless you "fix it" with magic items: that was considered a problem since 3.0. If you are familiar with the ELH, BAB and saves progression are 1/2 level, just like in 4e. </p><p></p><p>Unbalanced classes: just compare the average high level spellcaster and the average high level fighter/monk.</p><p></p><p>The problem, here, is that they couldn't really fix all of these problems even if they wanted to, because core had to be playable by itself. Would you consider a game that requires 100 or so pages of errata as "playable"( and I'm not saying it isn't, but as a customer I'd probably get the impression that they screwed up)?</p><p>They released a "hotfix" (3.5) that was as backwards compatible as possible, but they couldn't rehash the entire system in just 3 years. </p><p></p><p>As for 4e, every game has issues, but I think many of 3e's problems come from the fact that they couldn't move far enough from 2e.</p><p>Was 2e balanced at higher levels? No, but few people actually got there, so it was not perceived as a problem. Monsters were generally weaker, so Poly was weaker as well...</p><p>and so on. </p><p></p><p>In that respect, at least, it seems like 4e is covered, but only time will tell. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Njall, post: 4232530, member: 54719"] Well, most children feel like they're neglected when they first have a brother. It doesn't mean they are. WotC staffers like 4e, that's no surprise, considering they've come up with it, so they've probably done everything they could to make it as good as they think, and now they're telling us why they think they've improved the game. Unsurprisingly, they're using the best term of comparison they have: 3.x. And why are they comparing it to 3e? Because 3.x is a solid game. What would the merits of 4e be if 3.x sucked? Well, while this is a good question, I'd say that no, those problems were there even in core. Polymorph: broken by itself, IMO, simply because most monsters were not assumed to be played as PCs in the first place. And sure, with splats it got even nastier. The math, at higher levels, doesn't really work unless you "fix it" with magic items: that was considered a problem since 3.0. If you are familiar with the ELH, BAB and saves progression are 1/2 level, just like in 4e. Unbalanced classes: just compare the average high level spellcaster and the average high level fighter/monk. The problem, here, is that they couldn't really fix all of these problems even if they wanted to, because core had to be playable by itself. Would you consider a game that requires 100 or so pages of errata as "playable"( and I'm not saying it isn't, but as a customer I'd probably get the impression that they screwed up)? They released a "hotfix" (3.5) that was as backwards compatible as possible, but they couldn't rehash the entire system in just 3 years. As for 4e, every game has issues, but I think many of 3e's problems come from the fact that they couldn't move far enough from 2e. Was 2e balanced at higher levels? No, but few people actually got there, so it was not perceived as a problem. Monsters were generally weaker, so Poly was weaker as well... and so on. In that respect, at least, it seems like 4e is covered, but only time will tell. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
When did you enjoy 3.x?
Top