Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 105726" data-attributes="member: 2829">Re: Re: Re: invis vs flat footedSymantics. I used the wrong term. My bad. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />All of this I know and get. Once again, bad terminology on my part.But nowhere does it say otherwise. Nowhere. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> There is no information in the books that solidly points to either case. I'm inclined to agree that the invisibility will function during the first attack, but will fail immediately after. It makes sense because the spell would allow you one really good hit on an unaware target, which certainly isn't a bad thing. But it would also sort of makes sense that the spell wouldn't fail until the end of your action, which if you take a full attack action, that means at the end of ALL your attacks. And even then, it also sort of makes sense that the spell would simply fail before you even get your attack off. Official confirmation on this would make me feel better, so that's what I'm waiting for.And as far as improved invisibility is concerned, well, that one's obvious, and fun. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="kreynolds, post: 105726, member: 2829"] [b]Re: Re: Re: invis vs flat footed[/b] Symantics. I used the wrong term. My bad. :) All of this I know and get. Once again, bad terminology on my part. But nowhere does it say otherwise. Nowhere. ;) There is no information in the books that solidly points to either case. I'm inclined to agree that the invisibility will function during the first attack, but will fail immediately after. It makes sense because the spell would allow you one really good hit on an unaware target, which certainly isn't a bad thing. But it would also [I]sort of[/I] makes sense that the spell wouldn't fail until the end of your action, which if you take a full attack action, that means at the end of ALL your attacks. And even then, it also [I]sort of[/I] makes sense that the spell would simply fail [B]before[/B] you even get your attack off. Official confirmation on this would make me feel better, so that's what I'm waiting for. And as far as improved invisibility is concerned, well, that one's obvious, and fun. :D [/QUOTE]

Verification