Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
When Fiends Attack: Are Balors, Pit Fiends and Ultraloths too weak?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7008443" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>No, you are claiming it is easy and I can do the work myself. </p><p></p><p>I am saying it is hard and that I want to pay WotC for it. </p><p></p><p>Now: who is more likely correct. You, who doesn't want it and only post to dismiss any difficulties? Or I, who clearly want it, have thought long and hard about doing it myself, and concluded it's too much work to do myself?</p><p></p><p>What about that is so hard for you to understand and more importantly, accept? Huh?</p><p></p><p>Moreover, you have never accepted one important facet: that "officialness" is a quality of its own. Having a official product means many eyes on the rules, and lots of discussion. To me, that would be very valuable all by itself. </p><p></p><p>Now, the reason you always ignore this bit, I assume, is because what you don't want to admit Aaron, is that your only real argument here is that you don't want this product to exist. You don't have any real reasons that sound fancy and objective like the "it's genuinely impossible" swill you try to make us believe. If you just said "I'm not interested in that" that would be completely acceptable, but for some reason you follow me around, and everytime I suggest a rules expansion, you try to shoot that idea down in ways that make it sound like my ideas are unworkable somehow. </p><p></p><p>I'm tired of it. Just say the only thing I can respect: that you don't want it, and that you don't want the game to go in that direction. Your personal opinion, that carries exactly as much weight as mine.</p><p> </p><p>If you're not interested in such a product, simply don't buy it Aaron; don't argue why I shouldn't get my wish in ways that make it sound like objective fact. It's just smokescreens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7008443, member: 12731"] No, you are claiming it is easy and I can do the work myself. I am saying it is hard and that I want to pay WotC for it. Now: who is more likely correct. You, who doesn't want it and only post to dismiss any difficulties? Or I, who clearly want it, have thought long and hard about doing it myself, and concluded it's too much work to do myself? What about that is so hard for you to understand and more importantly, accept? Huh? Moreover, you have never accepted one important facet: that "officialness" is a quality of its own. Having a official product means many eyes on the rules, and lots of discussion. To me, that would be very valuable all by itself. Now, the reason you always ignore this bit, I assume, is because what you don't want to admit Aaron, is that your only real argument here is that you don't want this product to exist. You don't have any real reasons that sound fancy and objective like the "it's genuinely impossible" swill you try to make us believe. If you just said "I'm not interested in that" that would be completely acceptable, but for some reason you follow me around, and everytime I suggest a rules expansion, you try to shoot that idea down in ways that make it sound like my ideas are unworkable somehow. I'm tired of it. Just say the only thing I can respect: that you don't want it, and that you don't want the game to go in that direction. Your personal opinion, that carries exactly as much weight as mine. If you're not interested in such a product, simply don't buy it Aaron; don't argue why I shouldn't get my wish in ways that make it sound like objective fact. It's just smokescreens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
When Fiends Attack: Are Balors, Pit Fiends and Ultraloths too weak?
Top