Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
When modern ethics collide with medieval ethics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 5827617" data-attributes="member: 9037"><p>I am lucky my players love my world and love playing in it. And I don't want to give the impression that the PCs can't change my world. </p><p></p><p>I am not rigid nor do I railroad and I have no problem if the PCs bring about major changes in how things work by their actions. </p><p></p><p>One of the joys of DMing is letting PCs lose in your world and watch what they do.</p><p></p><p>That is not what I am talking about though when I say I would get angry if a player didn't like an aspect and demanded I change for no other reason than he didn't like it.</p><p></p><p>I work with my players to make their characters fun. I do things in the setting to work with their backgrounds. I give them the ability to have a chance to accomplish the goals they have for their characters. But I don't just willy nilly change the setting to accomplish that I work with in the setting.</p><p></p><p>If I was running a Kalamar game and the players wanted to take down the slavers there are in settings ways to accomplish this. There is a god that is against slavery and an organization called the Broken Chain. You don't have to make major changes to the setting to let the PCs have a chance at accomplishing their goals.</p><p></p><p>As a player I enjoy working in the setting as presented to accomplish what I want for my character. That to me is the challenge and I would be hugely disappointed to learn that I accomplished my goals only because the DM changed the setting to allow this. </p><p></p><p>In my roommate's setting nobles and royalty expect respect from the lower classes and they have all the power to punish the lower classes if they don't get it.</p><p></p><p>Now your character believes all men are created equal. </p><p></p><p>There doesn't have to be a conflict with the DM if you play it right. If all you do to prove this is go around mouthing off to the nobility getting into fights, getting arrested and then getting angry at the DM because the world just slapped you back then you are asking the DM to just change how the world works because of your PC.</p><p></p><p>Now if you do it in a way to raise rebellion among the commoners ala Zorro style, as an example, you are playing a character with the out look of all men are created equal but you are doing it in the setting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 5827617, member: 9037"] I am lucky my players love my world and love playing in it. And I don't want to give the impression that the PCs can't change my world. I am not rigid nor do I railroad and I have no problem if the PCs bring about major changes in how things work by their actions. One of the joys of DMing is letting PCs lose in your world and watch what they do. That is not what I am talking about though when I say I would get angry if a player didn't like an aspect and demanded I change for no other reason than he didn't like it. I work with my players to make their characters fun. I do things in the setting to work with their backgrounds. I give them the ability to have a chance to accomplish the goals they have for their characters. But I don't just willy nilly change the setting to accomplish that I work with in the setting. If I was running a Kalamar game and the players wanted to take down the slavers there are in settings ways to accomplish this. There is a god that is against slavery and an organization called the Broken Chain. You don't have to make major changes to the setting to let the PCs have a chance at accomplishing their goals. As a player I enjoy working in the setting as presented to accomplish what I want for my character. That to me is the challenge and I would be hugely disappointed to learn that I accomplished my goals only because the DM changed the setting to allow this. In my roommate's setting nobles and royalty expect respect from the lower classes and they have all the power to punish the lower classes if they don't get it. Now your character believes all men are created equal. There doesn't have to be a conflict with the DM if you play it right. If all you do to prove this is go around mouthing off to the nobility getting into fights, getting arrested and then getting angry at the DM because the world just slapped you back then you are asking the DM to just change how the world works because of your PC. Now if you do it in a way to raise rebellion among the commoners ala Zorro style, as an example, you are playing a character with the out look of all men are created equal but you are doing it in the setting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
When modern ethics collide with medieval ethics
Top