Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
When modern ethics collide with medieval ethics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 5827639" data-attributes="member: 9037"><p>In my game there are no heroes like Conan or Raistlan my PCs will one day be the heroes of legend. The PC cleric is the only cleric to be able to cast divine magic in over a thousand years.</p><p></p><p>When I DM most of the time my players know that I scale the world because I personally hate the whole I am 10th level adventurer I can now kick around the king and his army. And they are ok with it so there is no issue. But they also don't like the whole adventures as tyrants style of play. They like the feeling of knowing that there are always risks involved no matter their level. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Hers is the disconnect I am seeing on this. People seem to have this idea that the DM wants it one way and all the players want it another. Now when that happens you have a big issue. If the DM wants to run King Arthur and all the players want Conan everyone at the table is frustrated and unhappy. In that case the DM can say what the hay I will run it Conan or the players can say hey we will try King Arthur. But if neither side really wants to change then there is no way to really fix it.</p><p></p><p>But what happens if the DM and some of the players want it one way and one or two of the players don't. That is the issue. </p><p></p><p>As for I refuse to go to my knee style character. If all the players are playing this style then maybe the DM needs to rethink having a world where it is expected to bow to royalty.</p><p></p><p>But what if it is one player who feels this way and the rest of the table does not do you allow that one player to dictate how it is going to be? You can kick him out of the game or you can allow the characters to handle it. They can tell the guy you are not going to the king with us. </p><p></p><p>If he mouths off to the wrong noble the party can try and migrate the incident by stepping in and role playing out hey please ignore him he is not right in the head .</p><p></p><p>If the DM makes a world like this and a player wants to play a character who takes no knee he and the DM need to discuss it. The player needs to know well if you do that this all these things that can happen in this society. If he knows all of that and is still willing to play the character that way then he should not get angry when it happens to him.</p><p></p><p>If the player wants to play this style character because he thinks it will be cool to effect change the DM needs to know this and let the player know if it is a possibility or if the DM really does not want to handle this in this campaign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 5827639, member: 9037"] In my game there are no heroes like Conan or Raistlan my PCs will one day be the heroes of legend. The PC cleric is the only cleric to be able to cast divine magic in over a thousand years. When I DM most of the time my players know that I scale the world because I personally hate the whole I am 10th level adventurer I can now kick around the king and his army. And they are ok with it so there is no issue. But they also don't like the whole adventures as tyrants style of play. They like the feeling of knowing that there are always risks involved no matter their level. Hers is the disconnect I am seeing on this. People seem to have this idea that the DM wants it one way and all the players want it another. Now when that happens you have a big issue. If the DM wants to run King Arthur and all the players want Conan everyone at the table is frustrated and unhappy. In that case the DM can say what the hay I will run it Conan or the players can say hey we will try King Arthur. But if neither side really wants to change then there is no way to really fix it. But what happens if the DM and some of the players want it one way and one or two of the players don't. That is the issue. As for I refuse to go to my knee style character. If all the players are playing this style then maybe the DM needs to rethink having a world where it is expected to bow to royalty. But what if it is one player who feels this way and the rest of the table does not do you allow that one player to dictate how it is going to be? You can kick him out of the game or you can allow the characters to handle it. They can tell the guy you are not going to the king with us. If he mouths off to the wrong noble the party can try and migrate the incident by stepping in and role playing out hey please ignore him he is not right in the head . If the DM makes a world like this and a player wants to play a character who takes no knee he and the DM need to discuss it. The player needs to know well if you do that this all these things that can happen in this society. If he knows all of that and is still willing to play the character that way then he should not get angry when it happens to him. If the player wants to play this style character because he thinks it will be cool to effect change the DM needs to know this and let the player know if it is a possibility or if the DM really does not want to handle this in this campaign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
When modern ethics collide with medieval ethics
Top