Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bill Zebub" data-source="post: 9854924" data-attributes="member: 7031982"><p>I'm confused. Yes, there's all sorts of feinting and parrying and such in real sword fighting, but that's not part of D&D. All that stuff is abstracted away in the game. The decisions you actually make are the ones I described: choosing which square to stand in, choosing which target to attack, weighing the trade-off between provoking an opportunity attack and moving yourself to a better position, choosing which spell to cast, etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, you'd be wrong. I've thought about it a LOT. (Also, I'd love to hear <em>your</em> thinking on these topics, but I find conjectures about my own to be unnecessary.)</p><p></p><p>I could offer lots of examples that are somewhat analogous to the feinting/parrying/etc. examples in combat, but...again...that's not what is modeled by most RPGs (at least in D&D derived RPGs, which is the forum we're in).</p><p></p><p>We could lay out...or create random tables for, or even write software to automatically generate...climbing "routes" that required genuine decision points. An example of a decision point could be the choice between grabbing an easy hold that looks like it might be loose, or dynoing past it for the ledge, but risk missing. Or between a friction move requiring finesse or a brute force one-handed pull-up. Or a resource decision: do I put in a piton now, or save it for later when I might need it more?</p><p></p><p>But all of those are still an individual making decisions, and the cliff is not responding to those decisions. It would still miss what makes combat engaging in RPGs: a team of people all contributing to the group effort, opponents making their own decisions, all those dice rolls smoothing out the curve to mitigate lucky and unlucky rolls, and the situation evolving turn-by-turn <em>because of those decisions and their outcomes.</em></p><p></p><p>So, sure, it could be a clever mini-game within the game, but more like a board game and not like an RPG.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bill Zebub, post: 9854924, member: 7031982"] I'm confused. Yes, there's all sorts of feinting and parrying and such in real sword fighting, but that's not part of D&D. All that stuff is abstracted away in the game. The decisions you actually make are the ones I described: choosing which square to stand in, choosing which target to attack, weighing the trade-off between provoking an opportunity attack and moving yourself to a better position, choosing which spell to cast, etc. Well, you'd be wrong. I've thought about it a LOT. (Also, I'd love to hear [I]your[/I] thinking on these topics, but I find conjectures about my own to be unnecessary.) I could offer lots of examples that are somewhat analogous to the feinting/parrying/etc. examples in combat, but...again...that's not what is modeled by most RPGs (at least in D&D derived RPGs, which is the forum we're in). We could lay out...or create random tables for, or even write software to automatically generate...climbing "routes" that required genuine decision points. An example of a decision point could be the choice between grabbing an easy hold that looks like it might be loose, or dynoing past it for the ledge, but risk missing. Or between a friction move requiring finesse or a brute force one-handed pull-up. Or a resource decision: do I put in a piton now, or save it for later when I might need it more? But all of those are still an individual making decisions, and the cliff is not responding to those decisions. It would still miss what makes combat engaging in RPGs: a team of people all contributing to the group effort, opponents making their own decisions, all those dice rolls smoothing out the curve to mitigate lucky and unlucky rolls, and the situation evolving turn-by-turn [I]because of those decisions and their outcomes.[/I] So, sure, it could be a clever mini-game within the game, but more like a board game and not like an RPG. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
When Was it Decided Fighters Should Suck at Everything but Combat?
Top