Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
When will WOTC clarify the Stealth rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JDillard" data-source="post: 4368903" data-attributes="member: 67649"><p>There's this game in the US that kids play, we call it "telephone". The basic idea of this game is that you take a large number of kids and they sit in a circle. One of them comes up with an innocuous sentence, then whispers it into the ear of the child next to them. This proceeds around the circle, each child whispering what they heard. Generally by the time this gets all the way around, the sentence heard only barely resembles the original statement. </p><p> </p><p>This illustrates a point. The more people involved in a piece of communication, and the more hands it has to pass through, the more likely it is to get distorted. Hell, at least we all got readable, generally gramatically correct rulebooks. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p>A lot of stuff slipped through. There were, as I hear, a lot of versions of playtest stuff. I know the WotC guys I play with still make rules errors because they'd playtested lots and lots of versions of pretty much everything in the game and still have old, changed rules floating around in their heads.</p><p> </p><p>As it is, we've got a very workable set of rules with a few inconsistencies throughout. None of the inconsistencies I've seen are game-breaking, just confusing. And, all things considered, has anyone played a tabletop RPG that didn't periodically require a DM judgment call because a rule was ambiguous or simply not there? This is nothing new. </p><p> </p><p>It just makes me wonder when we see the "Why hasn't WotC answered this question yet?" posts. When the response is "they're working on it, give them time, the lack of answer isn't stopping you from playing the game" and you reply "well, then why didn't they not let the error happen in the first place"... it frustrates me a lot. There seems to be a lot of that going around. So the RAW aren't perfect. I'm still having a blast playing the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JDillard, post: 4368903, member: 67649"] There's this game in the US that kids play, we call it "telephone". The basic idea of this game is that you take a large number of kids and they sit in a circle. One of them comes up with an innocuous sentence, then whispers it into the ear of the child next to them. This proceeds around the circle, each child whispering what they heard. Generally by the time this gets all the way around, the sentence heard only barely resembles the original statement. This illustrates a point. The more people involved in a piece of communication, and the more hands it has to pass through, the more likely it is to get distorted. Hell, at least we all got readable, generally gramatically correct rulebooks. :) A lot of stuff slipped through. There were, as I hear, a lot of versions of playtest stuff. I know the WotC guys I play with still make rules errors because they'd playtested lots and lots of versions of pretty much everything in the game and still have old, changed rules floating around in their heads. As it is, we've got a very workable set of rules with a few inconsistencies throughout. None of the inconsistencies I've seen are game-breaking, just confusing. And, all things considered, has anyone played a tabletop RPG that didn't periodically require a DM judgment call because a rule was ambiguous or simply not there? This is nothing new. It just makes me wonder when we see the "Why hasn't WotC answered this question yet?" posts. When the response is "they're working on it, give them time, the lack of answer isn't stopping you from playing the game" and you reply "well, then why didn't they not let the error happen in the first place"... it frustrates me a lot. There seems to be a lot of that going around. So the RAW aren't perfect. I'm still having a blast playing the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
When will WOTC clarify the Stealth rules?
Top