Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Whenever you hit an enemy"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kurtomatic" data-source="post: 5336850" data-attributes="member: 85486"><p>It's much, much simpler than that. The game needs a term for the successful outcome of an attack roll. Instead of repeating the phrase "successful attack roll" fifty-bazillion times, they decided to use the word 'hit' as an official rules term for that outcome. Perhaps they could have chosen a better word, but nothing obvious comes to mind. I don't think this choice is any more ludicrous than intentionally conflating a game term with it's general language meaning.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, Shadowrun used the term 'success' constantly to describe a die roll that met or exceeded a target number, but the current (4th!) edition has now switched to the word 'hit'. Since checks in SR4 now often require a minimum 'hit' threshold, the word 'success' might induce the same kind of confusion faced in this thread. However, when a player says "I have three hits on my Perception check", nobody pretends there's an attack involved either. </p><p></p><p>Even in the older editions, if a player told me he had "one success", and I said that wasn't enough to achieve the desired result, no one was going to sqeal like a stuck pig and claim the word 'success' meant what it meant, and I was cheating them of their just reward. On the other hand, maybe somebody did squeal like such, and thus they've switched to 'hit'.., which appearently has its own baggage to live down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kurtomatic, post: 5336850, member: 85486"] It's much, much simpler than that. The game needs a term for the successful outcome of an attack roll. Instead of repeating the phrase "successful attack roll" fifty-bazillion times, they decided to use the word 'hit' as an official rules term for that outcome. Perhaps they could have chosen a better word, but nothing obvious comes to mind. I don't think this choice is any more ludicrous than intentionally conflating a game term with it's general language meaning. As an aside, Shadowrun used the term 'success' constantly to describe a die roll that met or exceeded a target number, but the current (4th!) edition has now switched to the word 'hit'. Since checks in SR4 now often require a minimum 'hit' threshold, the word 'success' might induce the same kind of confusion faced in this thread. However, when a player says "I have three hits on my Perception check", nobody pretends there's an attack involved either. Even in the older editions, if a player told me he had "one success", and I said that wasn't enough to achieve the desired result, no one was going to sqeal like a stuck pig and claim the word 'success' meant what it meant, and I was cheating them of their just reward. On the other hand, maybe somebody did squeal like such, and thus they've switched to 'hit'.., which appearently has its own baggage to live down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Whenever you hit an enemy"?
Top