Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 5337550" data-attributes="member: 2525">I would dearly like to know what AbdulAlhazred makes of this.Abdul, you've gone from: &quot;the DESIGNERS OF THE GAME state flat out unequivocally that Magic Missile hits&quot; to &quot;I'm pretty sure there was an actual post from one of the devs either in the thread linked above or in one of the other similar threads that have hashed this out over and over on Q&amp;A.&quot; to &quot;Why do I have to prove anything to you? ...It's...based on common sense&quot; to now we have a Dragon article stating you're wrong, and still no quote from you showing this supposed developer declaring your position to be correct, and this issue having been put bed ages ago in you opinion.All of this in a context where you've said to us &quot;I fully understand 4e rules. What I think a LOT of people fail to understand is that the DESIGNERS OF THE RULES theory of what an RPG is and how it works MANIFESTLY correspond with my own a lot more than they do with yours. This is pretty apparent if you go read the statements they've made on various rules issues,&quot;&nbsp; which I find to be a pretty challenging statement.So, how do you reconcile your position with that quote from the Dragon article?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 5337550, member: 2525"] I would dearly like to know what AbdulAlhazred makes of this. Abdul, you've gone from: "the DESIGNERS OF THE GAME [B]state flat out unequivocally[/B] that Magic Missile hits" to "[B]I'm pretty sure[/B] there was an actual post from one of the devs either in the thread linked above or in one of the other similar threads that have hashed this out over and over on Q&A." to "Why do I have to prove anything to you? ...It's...[B]based on common sense"[/B] to now we have a Dragon article stating you're wrong, and still no quote from you showing this supposed developer declaring your position to be correct, and this issue having been put bed ages ago in you opinion. All of this in a context where you've said to us "I fully understand 4e rules. What I think a LOT of people fail to understand is that the DESIGNERS OF THE RULES theory of what an RPG is and how it works MANIFESTLY correspond with my own a lot more than they do with yours. This is pretty apparent if you go read the statements they've made on various rules issues," which I find to be a pretty challenging statement. So, how do you reconcile your position with that quote from the Dragon article? [/QUOTE]

Verification