Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Where are the options?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6842419" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>This is what I think.</p><p></p><p>When you get a body of options in your lap (like the PHB of any edition) you do a careful analysis of what's there and what you want.</p><p></p><p>(Careful being a relative term; yes, I know some people are much less minmaxian than others)</p><p></p><p>And for your second and perhaps third character, you revisit that body of options. But to a lesser degree. Each of us gets a set of notions which get hard to change. Simply put, when you find a groove, you stick to it.</p><p></p><p>If you then get a new body of options (say, a splatbook), it's all fresh. You eagerly (again, relatively speaking) read through the new options, comparing, turning them inside out, the works.</p><p></p><p>But you tend to not do that with all the options back in the first body of options that you perhaps carelessly threw aside. Or simply never got to checking out because all the other cool stuff.</p><p></p><p>TL; DR: the fact that the PHB contains more options than ever doesn't mean 1) our capacity to absorb options has increased, or 2) our want for ever-fresh new content will subside</p><p></p><p>In other words, for a segment of the customer base, cramming the PHB so chock-full of options is a bit of waste. Since you see the good stuff and the bad stuff (which can differ from gamer to gamer) but not all the stuff. </p><p></p><p>Had they held back some of it, they could have had ready to go material for at least one crunchy delight to have been released by now.</p><p></p><p>Your examples, Eldritch Knight and the Arcane Trickster, are interesting in another way. The decision to include these two subclasses in the PHB is probably behind much of why the edition is accused of being too magical. For the first time, playing a fighter and rogue with actual spells is core. This would neatly have been avoided if these two were held back.</p><p></p><p>(I do realize that Wotc was scared shitless 5E would be another flop so I'm not really unsure why this particular edition got such a options-rich PHB)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6842419, member: 12731"] This is what I think. When you get a body of options in your lap (like the PHB of any edition) you do a careful analysis of what's there and what you want. (Careful being a relative term; yes, I know some people are much less minmaxian than others) And for your second and perhaps third character, you revisit that body of options. But to a lesser degree. Each of us gets a set of notions which get hard to change. Simply put, when you find a groove, you stick to it. If you then get a new body of options (say, a splatbook), it's all fresh. You eagerly (again, relatively speaking) read through the new options, comparing, turning them inside out, the works. But you tend to not do that with all the options back in the first body of options that you perhaps carelessly threw aside. Or simply never got to checking out because all the other cool stuff. TL; DR: the fact that the PHB contains more options than ever doesn't mean 1) our capacity to absorb options has increased, or 2) our want for ever-fresh new content will subside In other words, for a segment of the customer base, cramming the PHB so chock-full of options is a bit of waste. Since you see the good stuff and the bad stuff (which can differ from gamer to gamer) but not all the stuff. Had they held back some of it, they could have had ready to go material for at least one crunchy delight to have been released by now. Your examples, Eldritch Knight and the Arcane Trickster, are interesting in another way. The decision to include these two subclasses in the PHB is probably behind much of why the edition is accused of being too magical. For the first time, playing a fighter and rogue with actual spells is core. This would neatly have been avoided if these two were held back. (I do realize that Wotc was scared shitless 5E would be another flop so I'm not really unsure why this particular edition got such a options-rich PHB) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Where are the options?
Top