Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Where did my options go? - The New Paradigm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JDillard" data-source="post: 4289140" data-attributes="member: 67649"><p>So, I wonder if you're still approaching the system from a perspective that's expecting things that aren't there. Then, when they aren't, you've already got grounds to be upset.</p><p></p><p>Lets take a look at your post:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's the first thing that caught my attention. You skipped over something important. Your main choice was not, as you said, which feat and when. Your main choice was, and always will be in 4e, Race/Class. The designers have made this explicit on multiple occasions. Every other decision from here on out is going to be a decision of variability, a question of "what variety of Eladrin Fighter/Wizard am I making?" All other decisions stem directly from this one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would agree with you, though for more reasons than just the feat. As you start to level a bit, if you want your Wiz spells to actually hit you're going to need to be using an implement with them. Sword/wand makes a pretty good combination, giving you the flexibility to fight or cast without having to switch equip. This is going to be true of any multiclass that involves a melee and a non-melee though (except for cleric. Damn clerics get their implements on their necks, instead of in their hands! Lucky bastards! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is in fact exactly what I was getting at in the OP. However, I can give you a numeric number of how many choices you make at first level.</p><p></p><p>1 - Attributes</p><p>2 - Race</p><p>3 - Class</p><p>4 - Class option (twf ranger vs archer ranger)</p><p>5 - At-will #1</p><p>6 - At-will #2 (sometimes an easy, obvious choice for your build. sometimes not)</p><p>6b - At-will #3 for humans</p><p>7- Encounter</p><p>7b - At-will as encounter for h-elf</p><p>8 - Daily</p><p>9 - Feat</p><p>9b - Feat #2 for humans</p><p>10 - Equipment</p><p>10b - Starting rituals for wizard or cleric</p><p></p><p>It's not a ton of choices, but there's a fair amount there. I'm sure someone here could run the math and let us know how many permutations are possible given that number of choices. Significantly less than 3rd, but not an unplayably small amount.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, you are going for a *very specific* concept and have already limited yourself in certain ways. Eldorian, above, mentions a few other ways you could make a "fighting spellcaster" character concept. He also mentioned that WotC has already announced they're releasing one, a full-blown separate class one, in Forgotten Realms. The class version of something is always going to be better at that concept than the multiclass version, unless the concept is itself an "X with just a little bit of Y". </p><p></p><p>Further, it really appears as if you've constrained your thinking and are frustrating yourself by doing so. You want to make a classic elf F/MU. You've decided that this means Eladrin, Fighter, Wizard Multiclass. </p><p></p><p>Right there, you're nearing the end point of level 1 character creation and you want it to be the beginning. That's not how it works anymore. Race/Class/Class Variant/Multiclass is, for the rest of this edition, going to be the central decision. Everything else is just a variable of those parts. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I wouldn't. Or, if I did, I would accept that I'm hobbling myself in some ways. It'd be like playing a Fighter in 3e who exclusively uses a club. It's an option, but it's far from a good one. Still, I can do it if I want. And you can do your greatsword Eladrin Ftr/Wiz if you want. You'll just miss out on the implementy goodness I mentioned above.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Possibly you'll find a few. Possibly not. Depends on what you find interesting, and what you expect. I'm discovering more interesting things in playing (and my own playstyle) than char building, hence the whole point of this discussion. I would have sworn without a doubt that I was a leader player six months ago, but I'm enjoying the hell out of strikers now that I'm playing 4e. Which made me make my next character, an elven archer ranger/cleric. So much beautiful synergy there, I can't wait to try him out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JDillard, post: 4289140, member: 67649"] So, I wonder if you're still approaching the system from a perspective that's expecting things that aren't there. Then, when they aren't, you've already got grounds to be upset. Lets take a look at your post: Here's the first thing that caught my attention. You skipped over something important. Your main choice was not, as you said, which feat and when. Your main choice was, and always will be in 4e, Race/Class. The designers have made this explicit on multiple occasions. Every other decision from here on out is going to be a decision of variability, a question of "what variety of Eladrin Fighter/Wizard am I making?" All other decisions stem directly from this one. I would agree with you, though for more reasons than just the feat. As you start to level a bit, if you want your Wiz spells to actually hit you're going to need to be using an implement with them. Sword/wand makes a pretty good combination, giving you the flexibility to fight or cast without having to switch equip. This is going to be true of any multiclass that involves a melee and a non-melee though (except for cleric. Damn clerics get their implements on their necks, instead of in their hands! Lucky bastards! :) ) This is in fact exactly what I was getting at in the OP. However, I can give you a numeric number of how many choices you make at first level. 1 - Attributes 2 - Race 3 - Class 4 - Class option (twf ranger vs archer ranger) 5 - At-will #1 6 - At-will #2 (sometimes an easy, obvious choice for your build. sometimes not) 6b - At-will #3 for humans 7- Encounter 7b - At-will as encounter for h-elf 8 - Daily 9 - Feat 9b - Feat #2 for humans 10 - Equipment 10b - Starting rituals for wizard or cleric It's not a ton of choices, but there's a fair amount there. I'm sure someone here could run the math and let us know how many permutations are possible given that number of choices. Significantly less than 3rd, but not an unplayably small amount. Well, you are going for a *very specific* concept and have already limited yourself in certain ways. Eldorian, above, mentions a few other ways you could make a "fighting spellcaster" character concept. He also mentioned that WotC has already announced they're releasing one, a full-blown separate class one, in Forgotten Realms. The class version of something is always going to be better at that concept than the multiclass version, unless the concept is itself an "X with just a little bit of Y". Further, it really appears as if you've constrained your thinking and are frustrating yourself by doing so. You want to make a classic elf F/MU. You've decided that this means Eladrin, Fighter, Wizard Multiclass. Right there, you're nearing the end point of level 1 character creation and you want it to be the beginning. That's not how it works anymore. Race/Class/Class Variant/Multiclass is, for the rest of this edition, going to be the central decision. Everything else is just a variable of those parts. I wouldn't. Or, if I did, I would accept that I'm hobbling myself in some ways. It'd be like playing a Fighter in 3e who exclusively uses a club. It's an option, but it's far from a good one. Still, I can do it if I want. And you can do your greatsword Eladrin Ftr/Wiz if you want. You'll just miss out on the implementy goodness I mentioned above. Possibly you'll find a few. Possibly not. Depends on what you find interesting, and what you expect. I'm discovering more interesting things in playing (and my own playstyle) than char building, hence the whole point of this discussion. I would have sworn without a doubt that I was a leader player six months ago, but I'm enjoying the hell out of strikers now that I'm playing 4e. Which made me make my next character, an elven archer ranger/cleric. So much beautiful synergy there, I can't wait to try him out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Where did my options go? - The New Paradigm
Top