Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RefinedBean" data-source="post: 4297279" data-attributes="member: 55016">Fair enough.&nbsp; I'll go down to the store and check out the products you've written, revised, and published, and compare and contrast.&nbsp; You might be right!At any rate, I do think you have a point there.&nbsp; The build is very much key in the initial progression of your character.&nbsp; However, with the choice of bumping up two ability scores each level, as well as the new multi-class feats for dabbling, I don't see it as much of a problem.And what with the number of feats, I can be a Plate-Mail wearing Wizard pretty early in the game, or a ranged-attack Cleric, or what have you.&nbsp; Nobody's stopping you from doing this.And as for Powers, there always seems to be a middle route with most character classes.&nbsp; Warlocks can choose whichever power they want regardless of pact, Rangers can choose powers that can be both ranged and TWF, etc.&nbsp; There's still a lot of breathing room, but it's thrown under the heading of &quot;suboptimal.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RefinedBean, post: 4297279, member: 55016"] Fair enough. I'll go down to the store and check out the products you've written, revised, and published, and compare and contrast. You might be right! At any rate, I do think you have a point there. The build is very much key in the initial progression of your character. However, with the choice of bumping up two ability scores each level, as well as the new multi-class feats for dabbling, I don't see it as much of a problem. And what with the number of feats, I can be a Plate-Mail wearing Wizard pretty early in the game, or a ranged-attack Cleric, or what have you. Nobody's stopping you from doing this. And as for Powers, there always seems to be a middle route with most character classes. Warlocks can choose whichever power they want regardless of pact, Rangers can choose powers that can be both ranged and TWF, etc. There's still a lot of breathing room, but it's thrown under the heading of "suboptimal." [/QUOTE]

Verification