Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Where is everybody? (Fermi paradox)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 6255802" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>Planets capable of sustaining intelligent life as we would recognise it are rarer than Fermi imagined. Of those, planets that actually sustain life are rarer still. And those that sustain intelligent life are <em>much</em> rarer still.</p><p></p><p>Still, that still leaves a huge number of candidates out there.</p><p></p><p>However, for any given intelligent life form, there is a race against time - can they get to a point where they have a meaningful off-world presence before either (1) and extinction-level event wipes them out, (2) they wipe themselves out, (3) they pollute the planet to the extent that it can no longer support them, or (4) they run out of the required resources. Thus far, we've managed to avoid #2, just, but #3 isn't looking too good.</p><p></p><p>Worse, until recently, the main driver of our technological advancement has been our desire to kill one another. (It now appears to be entertainment.) That suggests to me:</p><p></p><p>- if a lifeform is similar to us, in that they expend a lot of time killing one another, their technology will advance very quickly... but they'll almost certainly wipe themselves out before getting off-planet.</p><p></p><p>- if a lifeform is less aggressive than us, they'll be less likely to kill themselves off, but their technology likewise won't advance at the same rate - they may never get to the point where they have the ability to go off-planet.</p><p></p><p>Add to that the fact that going off planet is going to be hideously expensive, hugely dangerous, and has no prospect of a better life at the other end (unless and until we develop FTL and can travel to another Earth-like planet), there's very little incentive to actually do so. Living on the moon, or Mars, or probably anywhere else in our solar system is going to <em>suck</em>. And yet, that's a necessary first step before we can really consider a mission outwith the solar system.</p><p></p><p>Basically, I think there's probably plenty of life out there, but I doubt we'll ever establish meaningful communications, never mind physically visiting (or being visited by) them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 6255802, member: 22424"] Planets capable of sustaining intelligent life as we would recognise it are rarer than Fermi imagined. Of those, planets that actually sustain life are rarer still. And those that sustain intelligent life are [i]much[/i] rarer still. Still, that still leaves a huge number of candidates out there. However, for any given intelligent life form, there is a race against time - can they get to a point where they have a meaningful off-world presence before either (1) and extinction-level event wipes them out, (2) they wipe themselves out, (3) they pollute the planet to the extent that it can no longer support them, or (4) they run out of the required resources. Thus far, we've managed to avoid #2, just, but #3 isn't looking too good. Worse, until recently, the main driver of our technological advancement has been our desire to kill one another. (It now appears to be entertainment.) That suggests to me: - if a lifeform is similar to us, in that they expend a lot of time killing one another, their technology will advance very quickly... but they'll almost certainly wipe themselves out before getting off-planet. - if a lifeform is less aggressive than us, they'll be less likely to kill themselves off, but their technology likewise won't advance at the same rate - they may never get to the point where they have the ability to go off-planet. Add to that the fact that going off planet is going to be hideously expensive, hugely dangerous, and has no prospect of a better life at the other end (unless and until we develop FTL and can travel to another Earth-like planet), there's very little incentive to actually do so. Living on the moon, or Mars, or probably anywhere else in our solar system is going to [i]suck[/i]. And yet, that's a necessary first step before we can really consider a mission outwith the solar system. Basically, I think there's probably plenty of life out there, but I doubt we'll ever establish meaningful communications, never mind physically visiting (or being visited by) them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Where is everybody? (Fermi paradox)
Top