Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Where is metamagic going?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1762256" data-attributes="member: 478"><p>Just a short explanation, how they can be read the way I meant. Don't really need to turn it into a discussion about the clarity of those rules, I just wanted to state, that it's not a given how they work or are meant to work from the context, though I initially read them the same way you did. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p> So, they are use-activated. Using them during preparation certainly is use-activated, too. And the text in parantheses could only apply to spontaneous casters for all we know.So, it only confers the ability to use the feat three times per day, but does not mention a change in applying the feat at all! Which is about the strongest argument for my view, since it implies, that the limits on using metamagic feats still apply, but it is not necessary to mention preparation, since there is no change, but since the rod powers the feat (obviously since no spell levels are added), it could be assumed, that sorcerers do not need to make the necessary modifications to the spell, which results in the full-round action casting time, but this rule specifically says, that they do. Of course, sorcerer just has to be read synonymously for all spontaneous casters, everything else would be kinda silly. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p> It doesn't seem very reasonable to assume, that a sorcerer, who is already better at applying metamagic than a wizard would suddenly be worse with an item, which helps doing so! Especially when looking at the Quicken metamagic rods.</p><p> </p><p> The individual rods say something like "wielder can <em>cast an empowered spell</em> thrice per day", which IMHO is the strongest hint at "spontaneous application" even for wizards. But even a spell, which is prepared with a rod (if they work that way) is cast and it would be casting an empowered spell (emphasis in that text is on <em>empowered</em>, not on <em>cast</em>, then), so this works either way, really.</p><p> </p><p> The text is simply unclear, but given how much more benefit it would be for prepared casters (better metamagic application is one of the boons of spontaneous casting, which those classes pay a hefty price for already!), I can only really see the other version to work properly and in a balanced way (as balanced as it can get with those powerful rods <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />).</p><p> </p><p> Bye</p><p> Thanee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thanee, post: 1762256, member: 478"] Just a short explanation, how they can be read the way I meant. Don't really need to turn it into a discussion about the clarity of those rules, I just wanted to state, that it's not a given how they work or are meant to work from the context, though I initially read them the same way you did. :) So, they are use-activated. Using them during preparation certainly is use-activated, too. And the text in parantheses could only apply to spontaneous casters for all we know.So, it only confers the ability to use the feat three times per day, but does not mention a change in applying the feat at all! Which is about the strongest argument for my view, since it implies, that the limits on using metamagic feats still apply, but it is not necessary to mention preparation, since there is no change, but since the rod powers the feat (obviously since no spell levels are added), it could be assumed, that sorcerers do not need to make the necessary modifications to the spell, which results in the full-round action casting time, but this rule specifically says, that they do. Of course, sorcerer just has to be read synonymously for all spontaneous casters, everything else would be kinda silly. :) It doesn't seem very reasonable to assume, that a sorcerer, who is already better at applying metamagic than a wizard would suddenly be worse with an item, which helps doing so! Especially when looking at the Quicken metamagic rods. The individual rods say something like "wielder can [i]cast an empowered spell[/i] thrice per day", which IMHO is the strongest hint at "spontaneous application" even for wizards. But even a spell, which is prepared with a rod (if they work that way) is cast and it would be casting an empowered spell (emphasis in that text is on [i]empowered[/i], not on [i]cast[/i], then), so this works either way, really. The text is simply unclear, but given how much more benefit it would be for prepared casters (better metamagic application is one of the boons of spontaneous casting, which those classes pay a hefty price for already!), I can only really see the other version to work properly and in a balanced way (as balanced as it can get with those powerful rods ;)). Bye Thanee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Where is metamagic going?
Top