Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Where is the Unearthed Arcana SRD?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyarlathotep" data-source="post: 1817731" data-attributes="member: 1799"><p>Done work, so allow me to elaborate.</p><p></p><p>Caveat: I'm not an expert on the OGL or OGC content.</p><p></p><p>As I understand it, OGC allows another company or person to use another company's rules/text (not in the plagurism sense) as long as it is properly accredited in the OGL/Section 15. This, obviously, is a good thing. That said, if a company is going to publish OGC content, they should be prepared for the fact that end-users are going to want to use it, as well as publishers.</p><p></p><p>Why shouldn't end-users be able to use it and post it (as long as it meets the requirements in the OGL)? By publishing all (?) of the rules in Unearthed Arcana as OGC, WotC has pretty much given the okay for it to be used like any other OGC. What difference does it make if it's for a publisher or an end user? To me it seems like publishers want it both ways. "Yes we want OGC, but only for us to use, not you". In my mind it's a little too late now to go back and say "Well, we didn't mean for it to be used like <em>that</em>".</p><p></p><p>Perhaps this is a flaw in the OGL, or perhaps it's the Law of Unintended Consequences rearing it's ugly head. In either case, if a company is going to publish OGC, they shouldn't complain* (outside their offices) when people use that OGC (to post in an SRD-style document, for example). They can be unhappy, they can wish people wouldn't do it, but frankly I think they might be better served to say "No, this is Closed Content" and then this whole thing is a moot issue.</p><p></p><p>What if a company published the UA OGC as a PDF document for sale? Would it be okay then? Now what if they offered it for free to their customers? Is it now "not okay"? Could a private individual publish the OGC from UA and charge money for it? What if they gave it away for free? This is no different than the many SRD's available for purchase out there (I recommend CMG's BTW).</p><p></p><p><<em>Accusatory paragraph removed. Apologies to Crothian</em>></p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if this is making any sense or not. My apolgies if it doesn't. My only excuse is that I'm on day 5 of quitting smoking and am about ready to (in the words of Rex Banner) kill anyone who looks at me cross-eyed.</p><p></p><p>*I'm using this as a turn of phrase, I don't mean it to sound like I think that publishers are money-grubbing weasels, who sit in their solid gold office blocks complaining about gamers like us**.</p><p></p><p>** Were I talking about politicians and Corporate CEO then I would mean it to sound that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyarlathotep, post: 1817731, member: 1799"] Done work, so allow me to elaborate. Caveat: I'm not an expert on the OGL or OGC content. As I understand it, OGC allows another company or person to use another company's rules/text (not in the plagurism sense) as long as it is properly accredited in the OGL/Section 15. This, obviously, is a good thing. That said, if a company is going to publish OGC content, they should be prepared for the fact that end-users are going to want to use it, as well as publishers. Why shouldn't end-users be able to use it and post it (as long as it meets the requirements in the OGL)? By publishing all (?) of the rules in Unearthed Arcana as OGC, WotC has pretty much given the okay for it to be used like any other OGC. What difference does it make if it's for a publisher or an end user? To me it seems like publishers want it both ways. "Yes we want OGC, but only for us to use, not you". In my mind it's a little too late now to go back and say "Well, we didn't mean for it to be used like [i]that[/i]". Perhaps this is a flaw in the OGL, or perhaps it's the Law of Unintended Consequences rearing it's ugly head. In either case, if a company is going to publish OGC, they shouldn't complain* (outside their offices) when people use that OGC (to post in an SRD-style document, for example). They can be unhappy, they can wish people wouldn't do it, but frankly I think they might be better served to say "No, this is Closed Content" and then this whole thing is a moot issue. What if a company published the UA OGC as a PDF document for sale? Would it be okay then? Now what if they offered it for free to their customers? Is it now "not okay"? Could a private individual publish the OGC from UA and charge money for it? What if they gave it away for free? This is no different than the many SRD's available for purchase out there (I recommend CMG's BTW). <[i]Accusatory paragraph removed. Apologies to Crothian[/i]> I'm not sure if this is making any sense or not. My apolgies if it doesn't. My only excuse is that I'm on day 5 of quitting smoking and am about ready to (in the words of Rex Banner) kill anyone who looks at me cross-eyed. *I'm using this as a turn of phrase, I don't mean it to sound like I think that publishers are money-grubbing weasels, who sit in their solid gold office blocks complaining about gamers like us**. ** Were I talking about politicians and Corporate CEO then I would mean it to sound that way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Where is the Unearthed Arcana SRD?
Top