Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Where should PC's stand, in terms of attribute scores?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian" data-source="post: 232703" data-attributes="member: 381"><p>OK, that was somewhat interesting ... Here's why I posted this. I did an exhaustive mathematical analysis of the 3d6 6 times base generation method, laying out overall total score distribution. Obiously, the average will be 63; but how does it split up toward the edges?</p><p></p><p>I noticed a very interesting thing as I put in some dividers for the natural split points-the ones I listed in my poll. For example, 25% of characters generated this way had a total attribute score of at least 69; since the point-buy method starts with a base total of 48 and (below 15) charges one point per attribute point, you need 21 points to build characters that will sit in the 25th percentile. Likewise, you need 25 points to hit the 90th percentile, 28 points to hit the 95th percentile, and 32 points to hit the 99th percentile. By some remarkable coincidence, these are the suggested point-buy totals in the DMG. (I'm not certain on that first one, as I can't find my book. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p></p><p>I imagine that Jonathan Tweet had a hand in this ...</p><p></p><p>I couldn't do an exhaustive numeric analysis for the rolling methods-just doing one for the 3d6 method left MS-Excel gasping for air. An approximate analysis showed that using 4d6-drop lowest method, 95% of PC's will be in the top 60% of the population, and the average total will be 73, in the 90th percentile. You may notice that the average is precisely the same as a 25 point buy ...</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I thought this might be useful information. If you're using 32-point buy and also feel that the PC's should be in the top 10% of the overall population, you might try to find a way to reconcile your intuitions, 'cause they don't match. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> This doesn't seem to be a hypothetical problem. IME, most people in the point-buy number polls/discussions liked 28 and 32, whereas in this poll, most people liked 25 and 28 (although they didn't know that's what they were saying they liked ...)</p><p></p><p>Oh-and for the three people who picked the last option-that corresponds to a 16-point buy. Make sure your armor is in good condition before you announce you're using that system for your next campaign. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian, post: 232703, member: 381"] OK, that was somewhat interesting ... Here's why I posted this. I did an exhaustive mathematical analysis of the 3d6 6 times base generation method, laying out overall total score distribution. Obiously, the average will be 63; but how does it split up toward the edges? I noticed a very interesting thing as I put in some dividers for the natural split points-the ones I listed in my poll. For example, 25% of characters generated this way had a total attribute score of at least 69; since the point-buy method starts with a base total of 48 and (below 15) charges one point per attribute point, you need 21 points to build characters that will sit in the 25th percentile. Likewise, you need 25 points to hit the 90th percentile, 28 points to hit the 95th percentile, and 32 points to hit the 99th percentile. By some remarkable coincidence, these are the suggested point-buy totals in the DMG. (I'm not certain on that first one, as I can't find my book. :) ) I imagine that Jonathan Tweet had a hand in this ... I couldn't do an exhaustive numeric analysis for the rolling methods-just doing one for the 3d6 method left MS-Excel gasping for air. An approximate analysis showed that using 4d6-drop lowest method, 95% of PC's will be in the top 60% of the population, and the average total will be 73, in the 90th percentile. You may notice that the average is precisely the same as a 25 point buy ... Anyway, I thought this might be useful information. If you're using 32-point buy and also feel that the PC's should be in the top 10% of the overall population, you might try to find a way to reconcile your intuitions, 'cause they don't match. :) This doesn't seem to be a hypothetical problem. IME, most people in the point-buy number polls/discussions liked 28 and 32, whereas in this poll, most people liked 25 and 28 (although they didn't know that's what they were saying they liked ...) Oh-and for the three people who picked the last option-that corresponds to a 16-point buy. Make sure your armor is in good condition before you announce you're using that system for your next campaign. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Where should PC's stand, in terms of attribute scores?
Top