Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="nonsi256" data-source="post: 5788247" data-attributes="member: 86164">I would expect a class with such a declaration to allow me to make a Juggernaut/Daredevil/Martial Artist/Sharpshooter/Battlefield Commander/Kensai and more – all more or less of equal level of power.No core fighter ever made that possible.Too similar to the Wizard to justify a separate base class.I would make the Barb an optional Fighter build.Not really. One of the earliest incarnations of the Monk was OD&D’s Mystic, introduced as a concept NPC in the 1985 “Master” (4th, black) boxed set and later reinvented in the 1992 Rules Cyclopedia.I don’t see how.Actually, a Sorcerer-Warlock mesh could be a nice core class.You haven’t really played one, have you?Bad idea.A spell-less skillmonkey is too iconic to pass up.Now that’s a really good idea.That was one messy inclusion. These classes radically differ from one another.Dragon ____ (whatever) class is not unique enough in role and aint worth the time investment unless it eventually embodies all 3 Dragonborn of Bahamut’s draconic aspects in a useful manner (the breath weapon aspect is just too weak).</blockquote>