Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which class is the most durable (level 1)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9601312" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Yes, you can. Both Fighters and Paladins start with chainmail in 5.5e. That's the third-best ordinary heavy armor in the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Barbarians do not start with any armor, not even medium. The best heavy armor Fighters can afford is, as stated, chainmail which provides 16 AC. If the Barbarian sacrifices a bunch of their starting gold for it (two thirds of it, in fact!), they can get scale, which only gives the 16 AC, meaning the Barbarian is still behind (even with a shield!) because of fighting style.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would any Barbarian do this? They cannot use Dex for weapons. Sure, finesse weapons <em>exist</em>, but they're incompatible with Rage. "When you make an attack <strong>using Strength</strong>—with either a weapon or an Unarmed Strike" etc., emphasis added. (Believe me, I'd LOVE it if Rage worked with Dex, because then I might be able to sell a DM on allowing the Zealot subclass to function as a 4e Avenger, which would be a significant thing for me.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would any Fighter <em>specifically trying to be durable at 1st level</em> NOT do this? They can switch out as soon as they hit level 2, so they aren't even locked into it.</p><p></p><p>So, no, I don't accept that there are a bunch of 1st level Barbarians going for 16 Dex and 16 Con. <em>One</em> of those two stats--most likely Dexterity--is going to be only 14 at best, which means you aren't getting more than 15 AC via Unarmored Defense. Fighting Style is not needed, but isn't a cost either, as noted. Any 16 Dex/16 Con Barbarian is stuck being less accurate and doing less damage while Raging until they get to a much higher level (4 minimum).</p><p></p><p>Also, note that of the three, <em>only</em> Fighter gets a Fighting Style at this level (and Barb never does!), so Defensive puts the Fighter that much ahead even over the Paladin.</p><p></p><p>1st level Fighter can do 16/14/16 for Str/Dex/Con, meaning they sacrifice no long-term potential while still having the best AC a 1st-level character can get. Chainmail (16 AC), sword and board (+2 AC), Defensive style (+1 AC), and anywhere between 2 and 5 uses of Second Wind per day, typically 3-4.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, I stand by what I said. The only way the Barbarian can be even <em>debatably</em> "more durable" is if they sacrifice their long-term potential for a tiny AC boost that still won't get them up to par with the Defensive Fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9601312, member: 6790260"] Yes, you can. Both Fighters and Paladins start with chainmail in 5.5e. That's the third-best ordinary heavy armor in the game. Barbarians do not start with any armor, not even medium. The best heavy armor Fighters can afford is, as stated, chainmail which provides 16 AC. If the Barbarian sacrifices a bunch of their starting gold for it (two thirds of it, in fact!), they can get scale, which only gives the 16 AC, meaning the Barbarian is still behind (even with a shield!) because of fighting style. Why would any Barbarian do this? They cannot use Dex for weapons. Sure, finesse weapons [I]exist[/I], but they're incompatible with Rage. "When you make an attack [B]using Strength[/B]—with either a weapon or an Unarmed Strike" etc., emphasis added. (Believe me, I'd LOVE it if Rage worked with Dex, because then I might be able to sell a DM on allowing the Zealot subclass to function as a 4e Avenger, which would be a significant thing for me.) Why would any Fighter [I]specifically trying to be durable at 1st level[/I] NOT do this? They can switch out as soon as they hit level 2, so they aren't even locked into it. So, no, I don't accept that there are a bunch of 1st level Barbarians going for 16 Dex and 16 Con. [I]One[/I] of those two stats--most likely Dexterity--is going to be only 14 at best, which means you aren't getting more than 15 AC via Unarmored Defense. Fighting Style is not needed, but isn't a cost either, as noted. Any 16 Dex/16 Con Barbarian is stuck being less accurate and doing less damage while Raging until they get to a much higher level (4 minimum). Also, note that of the three, [I]only[/I] Fighter gets a Fighting Style at this level (and Barb never does!), so Defensive puts the Fighter that much ahead even over the Paladin. 1st level Fighter can do 16/14/16 for Str/Dex/Con, meaning they sacrifice no long-term potential while still having the best AC a 1st-level character can get. Chainmail (16 AC), sword and board (+2 AC), Defensive style (+1 AC), and anywhere between 2 and 5 uses of Second Wind per day, typically 3-4. So yeah, I stand by what I said. The only way the Barbarian can be even [I]debatably[/I] "more durable" is if they sacrifice their long-term potential for a tiny AC boost that still won't get them up to par with the Defensive Fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which class is the most durable (level 1)?
Top