Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jeffh" data-source="post: 3304229" data-attributes="member: 2642">I went Paladin, though the Monk crowd almost has me persuaded.I couldn't imagine voting Bard because they make everyone else so much better it's frightening. Sure, Bards are fairly useless solo, and fail miserably if you try to play them like other classes (i.e. as insane psycho-killers, essentially&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> ). But that's a case of &quot;Doctor, doctor! It hurts when I do this!&quot; &quot;So don't do that, you twit!&quot;. Play them to their strengths, in the context they're obviously meant to be played in, and don't confuse lack of individual glory with lack of contribution, and you have a very solid character. But even Evil bards need to be team players to work, and it seems like some people don't know how to deal with that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jeffh, post: 3304229, member: 2642"] I went Paladin, though the Monk crowd almost has me persuaded. I couldn't imagine voting Bard because they make everyone [I]else [/I]so much better it's frightening. Sure, Bards are fairly useless solo, and fail miserably if you try to play them like other classes (i.e. as insane psycho-killers, essentially :p ). But that's a case of "Doctor, doctor! It hurts when I do this!" "So don't do that, you twit!". Play them to their strengths, in the context they're obviously meant to be played in, and don't confuse lack of individual glory with lack of contribution, and you have a very solid character. But even Evil bards need to be team players to work, and it seems like some people don't know how to deal with that. [/QUOTE]

Verification