Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Class or classes do you feel are unbalanced-too powerful?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zimbel" data-source="post: 2671770" data-attributes="member: 29912"><p><em>Heh. sounds a lot like my last high-level campaign- 7 players, rotating DM bewteen 4, DM's PC did something else during their run. If either of the major spellcasters were out, there was a lot more impact than the DMs who played frontliners. Once we both were out.</em></p><p></p><p>However this tends to lend support to the conclusion that at least at LV 19, a cleric is stronger than (whatever their classes are).</p><p></p><p>Of course, for all I know, one of the other PCs is also a Cleric <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> The reality is that you need a much larger sample size (or a way to improve control on your samples by a couple orders of power), which is annoying to get or create. Frankly at any level 15-18,20, I've only played one PC (in 3.0, a sorcerer) for LV 19,21-22, I've only DMed. From those, I can increase your sample size to 2 with minimal effort on my part: at LV 18, when the Cleric was out vs around LV 18 when the cleric was in (but a ranger/overpowerful prestige class was out) in an otherwise nearly identicle party, the party was far stronger with the cleric than with the ranger. Some of that was, admittedly the players; the Cleric build was fairly good, whereas the Ranger build was, even with the broken prestige class, not particuarly good. Simuarly, the Cleric's tactics were typically much better than the Ranger's. However, every time the Cleric's player DMed (or the Sorcerer's player DMed), the other party members would notice a large power difference.</p><p></p><p>Another possibility is that you're just a more challenging DM <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> One thing with rotating DMs that one notices is a wide dispartity of abilities and issues. Really, a better sample would control for DM (which the above happened to).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zimbel, post: 2671770, member: 29912"] [I]Heh. sounds a lot like my last high-level campaign- 7 players, rotating DM bewteen 4, DM's PC did something else during their run. If either of the major spellcasters were out, there was a lot more impact than the DMs who played frontliners. Once we both were out.[/I] However this tends to lend support to the conclusion that at least at LV 19, a cleric is stronger than (whatever their classes are). Of course, for all I know, one of the other PCs is also a Cleric :-) The reality is that you need a much larger sample size (or a way to improve control on your samples by a couple orders of power), which is annoying to get or create. Frankly at any level 15-18,20, I've only played one PC (in 3.0, a sorcerer) for LV 19,21-22, I've only DMed. From those, I can increase your sample size to 2 with minimal effort on my part: at LV 18, when the Cleric was out vs around LV 18 when the cleric was in (but a ranger/overpowerful prestige class was out) in an otherwise nearly identicle party, the party was far stronger with the cleric than with the ranger. Some of that was, admittedly the players; the Cleric build was fairly good, whereas the Ranger build was, even with the broken prestige class, not particuarly good. Simuarly, the Cleric's tactics were typically much better than the Ranger's. However, every time the Cleric's player DMed (or the Sorcerer's player DMed), the other party members would notice a large power difference. Another possibility is that you're just a more challenging DM :-) One thing with rotating DMs that one notices is a wide dispartity of abilities and issues. Really, a better sample would control for DM (which the above happened to). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Class or classes do you feel are unbalanced-too powerful?
Top