Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Class or classes do you feel are unbalanced-Underpowered
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 2664089" data-attributes="member: 35788"><p>This is a bit off topic and I admit it (although it does pertain to bards being weak so not really off topic).</p><p></p><p>The bard is weak if looked at purely on a combat analysis. The bard isn't great at buffing themselves like the cleric is ... and they can't at least hope to make up for their slowere BAB progression with more attacks like the monk tries (and often fails, but that is another argument many of the posters are already handling well enough! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> ).</p><p></p><p>But the bard isn't meant to shine on the battlefield. Really, they aren't. The bard is meant to shine in the taverns (making friends, arranging sponsors for quests, getting information, gaining followers and supporters) and they are meant to make <em><u><strong>others</strong></u></em> shine on the battlefield. To play a straight up bard may take a very selfless player ... moreso than any other class. To play a straight up bard means to be willing to want to make other people look good, knowing that you aren't going to get the credit for it in the long run. As proof of this point, just look at the votes it gets here.</p><p></p><p>Most people think the bard is weak because they want the bard to stand alone. And it is not designed to stand alone - or else .. you know what ... it is weaker. But that is precisely why the PHB says:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A 4 person party may be better off without a bard to make sure all the basics are covered (melee, stealth, magic offense, healing/buff). But once the 4 basics are covered, the bard is a great - no - perfect addition because the bard makes everyone else better at what they do. A truly selfless character makes the best bard. Bards that are about themselves are going to eaten alive.</p><p></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>Having said that, what you say about multiclassing may be true. But multiclassing a bard (not including PrCs for the moment) always makes me wonder if multiclassing with another character wound't be better. Multiclassing for the spells would be better done with a full arcane (or divine) caster. Multiclassing for the skills would be better done with a rogue. Multiclassing for the offense .. is .. well ... just not really making sense in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>Bards are best played straight up (A 20th level bard can do amazing things off the battlefield and on the battlefield can do amazingly wonderful things to his companions) OR taking PrCs that directly enhance their bardic talents. Most of the examples from the Complete Adventurer work as examples that help the bard in some aspect or another.</p><p></p><p>And, of course, this is just my opinion. If you would like an example of a truly non-combat bard designed to do nothing other than make sure her allies are as good as it gets, look at Sye Dillinger in my sig. She's an interesting concept - one that I honestly don't know if she'll work or not, but I am trying her out. "Combat" weak .. but "combat support" good.</p><p></p><p>Just my opinion. Good luck with your bard build, morez.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 2664089, member: 35788"] This is a bit off topic and I admit it (although it does pertain to bards being weak so not really off topic). The bard is weak if looked at purely on a combat analysis. The bard isn't great at buffing themselves like the cleric is ... and they can't at least hope to make up for their slowere BAB progression with more attacks like the monk tries (and often fails, but that is another argument many of the posters are already handling well enough! :p ). But the bard isn't meant to shine on the battlefield. Really, they aren't. The bard is meant to shine in the taverns (making friends, arranging sponsors for quests, getting information, gaining followers and supporters) and they are meant to make [I][U][B]others[/B][/U][/I] shine on the battlefield. To play a straight up bard may take a very selfless player ... moreso than any other class. To play a straight up bard means to be willing to want to make other people look good, knowing that you aren't going to get the credit for it in the long run. As proof of this point, just look at the votes it gets here. Most people think the bard is weak because they want the bard to stand alone. And it is not designed to stand alone - or else .. you know what ... it is weaker. But that is precisely why the PHB says: A 4 person party may be better off without a bard to make sure all the basics are covered (melee, stealth, magic offense, healing/buff). But once the 4 basics are covered, the bard is a great - no - perfect addition because the bard makes everyone else better at what they do. A truly selfless character makes the best bard. Bards that are about themselves are going to eaten alive. ... ... Having said that, what you say about multiclassing may be true. But multiclassing a bard (not including PrCs for the moment) always makes me wonder if multiclassing with another character wound't be better. Multiclassing for the spells would be better done with a full arcane (or divine) caster. Multiclassing for the skills would be better done with a rogue. Multiclassing for the offense .. is .. well ... just not really making sense in my opinion. Bards are best played straight up (A 20th level bard can do amazing things off the battlefield and on the battlefield can do amazingly wonderful things to his companions) OR taking PrCs that directly enhance their bardic talents. Most of the examples from the Complete Adventurer work as examples that help the bard in some aspect or another. And, of course, this is just my opinion. If you would like an example of a truly non-combat bard designed to do nothing other than make sure her allies are as good as it gets, look at Sye Dillinger in my sig. She's an interesting concept - one that I honestly don't know if she'll work or not, but I am trying her out. "Combat" weak .. but "combat support" good. Just my opinion. Good luck with your bard build, morez. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Class or classes do you feel are unbalanced-Underpowered
Top