Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which class will be the faveorite wrt multiclassing dips?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 4057355" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>Well, we know that Paladin Smites are charisma-based attacks. One can assume, logically, that wizard "Spells" (at-will, per-encounter and per-day) are intelligence-based attacks. If, logically, the wizard's magical "attacks" use the same level-based bonus (+1 per 2 levels) as every other attack type, then any character who knows wizard powers can also make an int-based magical attack.</p><p></p><p>Logically, it would make sense for the wizard to get a class-based bonus to those attacks (+2, for example) just as it would make sense for a fighter to get a class-based bonus to his melee attacks.</p><p></p><p>So a 9th-level wizard might be able to cast 9th-level spells with a magical attack bonus of +10. By contrast, the 9th-level fighter who takes a wizard training feat might gain access to a 9th-level power that he can use with a magical attack bonus of only +6. While it's still useful, the wizard has a definite advantage. Where did I get those numbers?</p><p></p><p>Wizard:</p><p>+4 BAB (9th-level) +4 (18 INT) +2 (wizard class bonus) = +10</p><p></p><p>Fighter:</p><p>+4 BAB (9th-level) +2 (14 INT) = +6</p><p></p><p>And it's likely that the discrepancy would be even higher, due to possible feat bonuses, differences in ability scores, a more powerful implement, and so on. But both characters will have the same 9th-level power, which means it'll be equally effective <em>assuming it succeeds</em>. So the 9th-level wizard's <em>fireball</em> will probably do more damage (because it beats more people's REF defense) than the fireball cast by a fighter who's taken the wizard training feat.</p><p></p><p>This way, the fighter's power is far from "ineffective." But there's still definite benefits to being the wizard.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>See above. I think the power will be restricted by character level. In other words, by taking the "Wizard Training" feat you'll be able to choose any wizard power with a level equal to your character level (or less). So a 9th-level fighter who takes wizard training can take any wizard power that's Level 9 or lower.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 4057355, member: 32164"] Well, we know that Paladin Smites are charisma-based attacks. One can assume, logically, that wizard "Spells" (at-will, per-encounter and per-day) are intelligence-based attacks. If, logically, the wizard's magical "attacks" use the same level-based bonus (+1 per 2 levels) as every other attack type, then any character who knows wizard powers can also make an int-based magical attack. Logically, it would make sense for the wizard to get a class-based bonus to those attacks (+2, for example) just as it would make sense for a fighter to get a class-based bonus to his melee attacks. So a 9th-level wizard might be able to cast 9th-level spells with a magical attack bonus of +10. By contrast, the 9th-level fighter who takes a wizard training feat might gain access to a 9th-level power that he can use with a magical attack bonus of only +6. While it's still useful, the wizard has a definite advantage. Where did I get those numbers? Wizard: +4 BAB (9th-level) +4 (18 INT) +2 (wizard class bonus) = +10 Fighter: +4 BAB (9th-level) +2 (14 INT) = +6 And it's likely that the discrepancy would be even higher, due to possible feat bonuses, differences in ability scores, a more powerful implement, and so on. But both characters will have the same 9th-level power, which means it'll be equally effective [i]assuming it succeeds[/i]. So the 9th-level wizard's [i]fireball[/i] will probably do more damage (because it beats more people's REF defense) than the fireball cast by a fighter who's taken the wizard training feat. This way, the fighter's power is far from "ineffective." But there's still definite benefits to being the wizard. See above. I think the power will be restricted by character level. In other words, by taking the "Wizard Training" feat you'll be able to choose any wizard power with a level equal to your character level (or less). So a 9th-level fighter who takes wizard training can take any wizard power that's Level 9 or lower. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which class will be the faveorite wrt multiclassing dips?
Top