Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9354081" data-attributes="member: 7635">Tautology is equally fun. D&D class exists because this is D&D is equally absurd. But that was my point: we accept the existence of certain classes (fighter, ranger, barbarian, sorcerer) and not others (assassin, illusionist, warlord, psion) and there is no logical reason to do that, except tradition. Trying to argue validity of why a sorcerer should be a class and not a subclass of wizard is like arguing why chocolate should be on the Baskin & Robbin's 31 flavors, but not Blue Moon. The argument that there should be a 4e level of classes and the argument there should be no classes are both valid because the criteria for both is "my feelings"</blockquote>