Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which classes have the least identity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="W'rkncacnter" data-source="post: 9365672" data-attributes="member: 7033455"><p>that doesn't follow. the numbers are still the numbers - whether DPR matters or not doesn't change that. and if i'm looking at DPR, clearly for whatever purpose i'm evaluating it for, it matters.</p><p></p><p>this is what i mean by your distinction not being helpful - you're just saying "your criteria are subjective, so your whole assessment isn't useful", but the criteria being picked clearly matter if they're the criteria being picked!</p><p></p><p>...okay? all this really does is attack your assessment of the banneret, so i have no idea why you're bringing it up.</p><p></p><p>...what? it absolutely CAN. what are you on about?</p><p></p><p>who's saying they are? do you think only quantitative properties can be objectively evaluated? i mean, they're definitely <em>easier </em>to objectively evaluate.</p><p></p><p>that would be changing the criteria of the evaluation. you could still make an objective evaluation taking those other aspects into account.</p><p></p><p>but more importantly...yeah, you can do what you want. that doesn't make every possible decision equally viable.</p><p></p><p>a decision does not become a good one simply because you decide that it is for yourself. people make bad or just suboptimal decisions all the time. and you're allowed to do that - but to then go and say it was a "good" decision just because you decided so is ridiculous.</p><p></p><p>i don't care about the banneret.</p><p></p><p>not only is this not advice, there's clearly been no attempt at actual evaluation here. as an attempt at reductio ad absurdem, it's embarrassing.</p><p></p><p>you do have the right to tell me that, though, so hey, i'll enjoy being a vampire or whatever creature i've become to last that long in your head.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]1W7c8QghPxk[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>i do not find this to be a constructive or useful viewpoint in the slightest.</p><p></p><p>i mean, to a point, it can be. but when, to take an example for a conversation i got into on another thread, you want every non-fighter class to just be the fighter but with more...i don't think calling that bad is really subjective at that point.</p><p></p><p>i mean, that's your problem at that point.</p><p></p><p>i...have no idea what you mean by this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="W'rkncacnter, post: 9365672, member: 7033455"] that doesn't follow. the numbers are still the numbers - whether DPR matters or not doesn't change that. and if i'm looking at DPR, clearly for whatever purpose i'm evaluating it for, it matters. this is what i mean by your distinction not being helpful - you're just saying "your criteria are subjective, so your whole assessment isn't useful", but the criteria being picked clearly matter if they're the criteria being picked! ...okay? all this really does is attack your assessment of the banneret, so i have no idea why you're bringing it up. ...what? it absolutely CAN. what are you on about? who's saying they are? do you think only quantitative properties can be objectively evaluated? i mean, they're definitely [I]easier [/I]to objectively evaluate. that would be changing the criteria of the evaluation. you could still make an objective evaluation taking those other aspects into account. but more importantly...yeah, you can do what you want. that doesn't make every possible decision equally viable. a decision does not become a good one simply because you decide that it is for yourself. people make bad or just suboptimal decisions all the time. and you're allowed to do that - but to then go and say it was a "good" decision just because you decided so is ridiculous. i don't care about the banneret. not only is this not advice, there's clearly been no attempt at actual evaluation here. as an attempt at reductio ad absurdem, it's embarrassing. you do have the right to tell me that, though, so hey, i'll enjoy being a vampire or whatever creature i've become to last that long in your head. [MEDIA=youtube]1W7c8QghPxk[/MEDIA] i do not find this to be a constructive or useful viewpoint in the slightest. i mean, to a point, it can be. but when, to take an example for a conversation i got into on another thread, you want every non-fighter class to just be the fighter but with more...i don't think calling that bad is really subjective at that point. i mean, that's your problem at that point. i...have no idea what you mean by this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which classes have the least identity?
Top