Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which classes have the least identity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="W'rkncacnter" data-source="post: 9365836" data-attributes="member: 7033455"><p>because that's a cavalier. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>but seriously, ignoring that you're already pigeonholing your options down to suboptimal ones by single classing fighter, you have a bunch of better options just in the fighter. cavaliers, again, are much closer to archetypical knights with how they work with a mount (knights were cavalry units), though cavaliers have their problems what with mounts not always being practical. the samurai has a similar persuasion boost to the banneret, but lets you really lean into the fighter's main advantage (attacking). and the battle master has options for (temp) healing, protecting your allies, giving them additional attacks, and gaining bonuses to various skill checks (including persuasion), without having them take your base class resources like the banneret does (and sure, the skill checks do take subclass resources where the banneret's persuasion boost doesn't...but let's be honest, you're probably not your party's main face as a fighter regardless of subclass).</p><p></p><p>in comparison, the banneret basically boils down to "when you use your main class resources, you can give your allies a discount version of the same effects". and that's not <em>terrible,</em> but it means if you want to get good use of your subclass, you need to time what would otherwise be pure self-buffs with whenever it'd also best benefit your party, which makes your base class features significantly more situational then they otherwise would be. no other fighter subclass does that. the only part of the banneret that doesn't make you worry about that is the persuasion boost, which...i mean, okay, cool, i can be an off-face, but i could also do that as a samurai or battle master, and if i do that then i don't need to worry about saving my base class resources for when i can buff my class.</p><p></p><p>so in short, you can get a lot of similar effects from other subclasses, those subclasses can represent the concept of knighthood at least as well if not better, and those subclasses don't force you to completely change how you use your base class abilities. so, hey, pick banneret if you want, but you can definitely do better.</p><p></p><p>and i didn't even get into echo or eldritch knights...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="W'rkncacnter, post: 9365836, member: 7033455"] because that's a cavalier. ;) but seriously, ignoring that you're already pigeonholing your options down to suboptimal ones by single classing fighter, you have a bunch of better options just in the fighter. cavaliers, again, are much closer to archetypical knights with how they work with a mount (knights were cavalry units), though cavaliers have their problems what with mounts not always being practical. the samurai has a similar persuasion boost to the banneret, but lets you really lean into the fighter's main advantage (attacking). and the battle master has options for (temp) healing, protecting your allies, giving them additional attacks, and gaining bonuses to various skill checks (including persuasion), without having them take your base class resources like the banneret does (and sure, the skill checks do take subclass resources where the banneret's persuasion boost doesn't...but let's be honest, you're probably not your party's main face as a fighter regardless of subclass). in comparison, the banneret basically boils down to "when you use your main class resources, you can give your allies a discount version of the same effects". and that's not [I]terrible,[/I] but it means if you want to get good use of your subclass, you need to time what would otherwise be pure self-buffs with whenever it'd also best benefit your party, which makes your base class features significantly more situational then they otherwise would be. no other fighter subclass does that. the only part of the banneret that doesn't make you worry about that is the persuasion boost, which...i mean, okay, cool, i can be an off-face, but i could also do that as a samurai or battle master, and if i do that then i don't need to worry about saving my base class resources for when i can buff my class. so in short, you can get a lot of similar effects from other subclasses, those subclasses can represent the concept of knighthood at least as well if not better, and those subclasses don't force you to completely change how you use your base class abilities. so, hey, pick banneret if you want, but you can definitely do better. and i didn't even get into echo or eldritch knights... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which classes have the least identity?
Top