Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7828346" data-attributes="member: 6919838">So for me, classes that meet their expectationsVery wellBarbarianBardClericDruidPaladinRogueWizardAdequately but have problemsFighter (often a little short when looking at DPR alone, but fine when realizing it's big on defense and sustain too)Monk (just so-so for some, sum of parts not reliably good as a whole)Ranger (some good sub-classes meet expectations, others fall short and base class abilities too prone for setting-shaft)Not wellSorcerer (outside of DPR, not enough ability to fit their obvious and magnificent sub-classes thematically - meaning they will fall short of reaching their concepts)Warlock (outside of DPR, not enough ability to fit their obvious and magnificent sub-classes thematically - meaning they will fall short of reaching their concepts)</blockquote>