Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Einlanzer0" data-source="post: 7320036" data-attributes="member: 6788934">I'm worried they're going down the path of shoehorning every concept into a subclass or a background, which is the wrong way to go. Some concepts are thematically broad/meaty, interesting, and iconic enough to be full classes that could have a ton of subclasses, and there's asymmetry in what we currently have (i.e. no arcane half-caster, very few d6 HD classes, etc.); WotC needs to get on this. Warlord/Marshal (non-magical supportive/leader warrior; one of the most interesting and well designed 4e classes)Witch (a mix of arcane and divine magic with a primal/mystic theme, very distinctive from wizards and warlords in terms of flavor)Shaman (uses spirits and is very distinctive from druids in terms of flavor)Gish (as an arcane half-caster)Scholar - a knowledge/skill based with an academic rather than a punk flavorSome classes that have historically been full classes I actually prefer a a subclass option, such as the artificer. That works perfectly well as a wizard subclass.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Einlanzer0, post: 7320036, member: 6788934"] I'm worried they're going down the path of shoehorning every concept into a subclass or a background, which is the wrong way to go. Some concepts are thematically broad/meaty, interesting, and iconic enough to be full classes that could have a ton of subclasses, and there's asymmetry in what we currently have (i.e. no arcane half-caster, very few d6 HD classes, etc.); WotC needs to get on this. Warlord/Marshal (non-magical supportive/leader warrior; one of the most interesting and well designed 4e classes) Witch (a mix of arcane and divine magic with a primal/mystic theme, very distinctive from wizards and warlords in terms of flavor) Shaman (uses spirits and is very distinctive from druids in terms of flavor) Gish (as an arcane half-caster) Scholar - a knowledge/skill based with an academic rather than a punk flavor Some classes that have historically been full classes I actually prefer a a subclass option, such as the artificer. That works perfectly well as a wizard subclass. [/QUOTE]

Verification