Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 7320416">I've been wondering that since the PHB got published.&nbsp; I've always thought the Battlemaster was a little contrived and hard to explain.So you should be happy, right?Or is it that you want an a la carte selection of abilities in one class, so that you get exactly everything you want without having to multiclass?That would be great.&nbsp; I really like Shadow Monk/Rogue, except that there's no way to get all of the abilities in one character, so I guess I want a new class that lets me do that.&nbsp; And while we're at it, although I've never done the Warlock dip, I'll have some of that on my order, too, please.EDIT: Jokes aside, I should add that although Warlord-like abilities are sprinkled here and there as abilities, feats, etc., and that individually I'm ok with them, it is exactly the concentration of all of them in one class that worries me.&nbsp; Not from a mechanical/balance point of view but as a concept. Wait...who is &quot;up in arms&quot;?&nbsp; (I'll point out that you are the one using lots of ALL CAPS).&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not a fan of action-granting, but it's not as bad as rapiers.&nbsp; Or Drow.&nbsp; (Never mind rapier-wielding Drow.)&nbsp; Both of which are in the game.No, my objections to Warlord are based on the concept, not the mechanics.&nbsp; I was just responding to the claim that there's nothing wrong with granting actions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Guest 6801328, post: 7320416"] I've been wondering that since the PHB got published. I've always thought the Battlemaster was a little contrived and hard to explain. So you should be happy, right? Or is it that you want an a la carte selection of abilities in one class, so that you get exactly everything you want without having to multiclass? That would be great. I really like Shadow Monk/Rogue, except that there's no way to get [I]all[/I] of the abilities in one character, so I guess I want a new class that lets me do that. And while we're at it, although I've never done the Warlock dip, I'll have some of that on my order, too, please. EDIT: Jokes aside, I should add that although Warlord-like abilities are sprinkled here and there as abilities, feats, etc., and that individually I'm ok with them, it is exactly the concentration of all of them in one class that worries me. Not from a mechanical/balance point of view but as a concept. Wait...who is "up in arms"? (I'll point out that you are the one using lots of ALL CAPS). I'm not a fan of action-granting, but it's not as bad as rapiers. Or Drow. (Never mind rapier-wielding Drow.) Both of which are in the game. No, my objections to Warlord are based on the concept, not the mechanics. I was just responding to the claim that there's nothing wrong with granting actions. [/QUOTE]

Verification