Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which common monsters/creature types do you exclude from your campaigns?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="el-remmen" data-source="post: 8657392" data-attributes="member: 11"><p>I was thinking about my current homebrew, which unlike the top down homebrew I ran for 20 years, I am making up as I go along based on the needs of the two current games I am running there, and how there are certain monsters I have not used in it and with a little more thought realized that I tended not to use in general. As such, I thought perhaps I should straight up decide to exclude them from these games.</p><p></p><p>While I know it is not the framework for settings that WotC is using for their current setting linked projects (and the ones to-come) where they want to include as much as possible, I think what you <em>don't </em>include in a setting is as important as what you do include. In fact, it is easier to lay out a few things that do not exist than to try to list everything that is allowed. It is like the 10 Commandments which were groundbreaking in making sure that the majority of them (8 of 10) are things to NOT do, as opposed to things you MUST do (only two). </p><p></p><p>Anyway, with that in mind, I realize that a monster I have rarely used and have no interest in using in any game that is not specifically a horror themed game, are cursed lycanthropes. While, I may choose to include some kind of "true lycanthrope" shapechanging animal people - like ratfolk or werebears. I am not into the full moon, body horror, loss of control, thing.</p><p></p><p>Another exclusion are dragonborn, which I just don't like as an idea - and replace with lizardfolk.</p><p>Tritons are another creature type I have excluded, because between sea elves, sahuagin, koalinth, merfolk, and locathah, do we really need yet another aquatic species? Esp. since I like the idea of sentient dolphins.</p><p></p><p>There are other creatures that I exclude until such time that I think they might become setting appropriate due to the events of the campaign. Thus, no githyanki unless the PCs go plane-hopping, no girallons unless I decide it is a one-off wizard experiment gone wrong, probably will never use djinni or efreeti etc. . . unless they are thematically appropriate to a place in the setting that has been uncovered, and so on. </p><p></p><p></p><p>So which creatures do you exclude and why? And is it something you decide on ahead of time or something you decide as you prep events/adventures?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="el-remmen, post: 8657392, member: 11"] I was thinking about my current homebrew, which unlike the top down homebrew I ran for 20 years, I am making up as I go along based on the needs of the two current games I am running there, and how there are certain monsters I have not used in it and with a little more thought realized that I tended not to use in general. As such, I thought perhaps I should straight up decide to exclude them from these games. While I know it is not the framework for settings that WotC is using for their current setting linked projects (and the ones to-come) where they want to include as much as possible, I think what you [I]don't [/I]include in a setting is as important as what you do include. In fact, it is easier to lay out a few things that do not exist than to try to list everything that is allowed. It is like the 10 Commandments which were groundbreaking in making sure that the majority of them (8 of 10) are things to NOT do, as opposed to things you MUST do (only two). Anyway, with that in mind, I realize that a monster I have rarely used and have no interest in using in any game that is not specifically a horror themed game, are cursed lycanthropes. While, I may choose to include some kind of "true lycanthrope" shapechanging animal people - like ratfolk or werebears. I am not into the full moon, body horror, loss of control, thing. Another exclusion are dragonborn, which I just don't like as an idea - and replace with lizardfolk. Tritons are another creature type I have excluded, because between sea elves, sahuagin, koalinth, merfolk, and locathah, do we really need yet another aquatic species? Esp. since I like the idea of sentient dolphins. There are other creatures that I exclude until such time that I think they might become setting appropriate due to the events of the campaign. Thus, no githyanki unless the PCs go plane-hopping, no girallons unless I decide it is a one-off wizard experiment gone wrong, probably will never use djinni or efreeti etc. . . unless they are thematically appropriate to a place in the setting that has been uncovered, and so on. So which creatures do you exclude and why? And is it something you decide on ahead of time or something you decide as you prep events/adventures? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which common monsters/creature types do you exclude from your campaigns?
Top