Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which Edition Had the Best Ranger?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 8116764" data-attributes="member: 6855114"><p>Drizzt did not ruined the ranger. Its popularity did.</p><p>Two weapon weilding rangers were already a thing even in 1ed before Drizzt came along.</p><p>The only problem, is that the character became so popular that everyone wanted to emulate what he could do. Which is what lead to the total transformation of the ranger.</p><p></p><p>The ranger should still be a subclass of the fighter or at least have more "fighter" type powers. That the ranger lost wizard spell is not really a big for me. But the heavy armor loss is a big thing. Bonus damage vs enemy type should never have been dropped. And the ranger should have had about a max of 2 or 3 enemy type. The UA did a good job on that. Take the general pick on the ranger and ignore the conclave and only take the subclass as written in the PHB and whatever book you use. We removed concentration from Hunter's mark and the beast can now be commanded with a bonus action. All these made a quite acceptable ranger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 8116764, member: 6855114"] Drizzt did not ruined the ranger. Its popularity did. Two weapon weilding rangers were already a thing even in 1ed before Drizzt came along. The only problem, is that the character became so popular that everyone wanted to emulate what he could do. Which is what lead to the total transformation of the ranger. The ranger should still be a subclass of the fighter or at least have more "fighter" type powers. That the ranger lost wizard spell is not really a big for me. But the heavy armor loss is a big thing. Bonus damage vs enemy type should never have been dropped. And the ranger should have had about a max of 2 or 3 enemy type. The UA did a good job on that. Take the general pick on the ranger and ignore the conclave and only take the subclass as written in the PHB and whatever book you use. We removed concentration from Hunter's mark and the beast can now be commanded with a bonus action. All these made a quite acceptable ranger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which Edition Had the Best Ranger?
Top