Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which Edition Had the Best Ranger?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 8117390" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>Because they're even stupider. Have you read the class recently? It's quite unplayable.</p><p></p><p>They essentially can't use missile weapons. "Weapons that deal out damage at a distance (including pole arms, missile weapons, and the two-handed sword) call into question the cavalier’s personal bravery, and as such are avoided by all except the most powerful of cavaliers. The cavalier may use these questionable weapons at normal non-proficiency penalties, but their use may violate the character’s chivalric code." You can't even get <em>proficient</em> in a bow until like 18th level!</p><p></p><p>Their code of behavior is far, far more rigid. The code of behavior is not like the Paladin's "be just and good". It's "be a massive prick and a self-righteous, noble-born jerk."</p><p></p><p>Check out the code. I've bolded all the ones that frequently cause party conflict and which didn't exist in the original Paladin:</p><p></p><p>[excerpt]</p><p>The code for a feudal campaign may be summed up as follows. The DM may adjust this code to fit his or her own campaign.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Noble service cheerfully rendered</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Defense of any charge unto death</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Courage and enterprise in obedience to rule</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Respect for all peers and equals</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Honor to all above your station</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Obedience and respect from all beneath your station</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Scorn for those who are lowly and ignoble (this includes knightly limitations on weapons and armor)</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Military prowess exercised in service to your lord</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Courtesy to all ladies (if the cavalier is male)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>War is the flowering of chivalry</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Battle is the test of manhood</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Combat is glory</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Personal glory above all in battle</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Death to all who oppose the cause</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Death before dishonor</strong></li> </ul><p>In enforcing this code, the DM may reduce or eliminate experience that is gained by the cavalier if its gaining violates the spirit or letter of the code. A cavalier who retreats from battle, even to save fellow party members, would receive half experience for the beasts slain in his or her retreat. Similarly, a cavalier who dons leather armor to infiltrate a thieves guild to effect a rescue will gain no experience, since the rescue would be done in means not approved</p><p>of by the code. Note that even neutral and evil cavaliers are bound by this code, but in their cases the obedience is to non-good masters.</p><p>[/excerpt]</p><p></p><p>That first one, "obedience and respect from all beneath your station," is kind of a significant issue. Since the class all but requires you to be noble-born and highly favored, <em>everyone else in the party</em> is going to be beneath your station!</p><p></p><p>And their limitation in battle is even worse (again, with the problematic bits bolded):</p><p></p><p>[excerpt]</p><p>As a result of the code and desire for battle, <strong>cavaliers cannot be controlled in battle situations</strong>. <strong>They will charge any enemy in sight</strong>, with the following order of preference:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Powerful monsters (dragons, demons, giants, etc.) serving enemy leaders, then the leaders themselves.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Opponent cavaliers of great renown, enemy flags and standards.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Opponent cavalry of noble or elite status</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Other opponent cavalry</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Opponent elite footmen</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Opponent camp and headquarters</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Opponent melee troops</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Levies or peasants</li> </ol><p>The cavalier’s charge will be made at full speed, regardless of army cohesion, <strong>intervening friendly troops</strong>, or other such considerations.</p><p>[/excerpt]</p><p></p><p>That last line is particularly irritating because cavaliers like to use warhorses and lances. I honestly don't see how anyone could possibly play this class as written.</p><p></p><p>All excerpts are from the class description in 1e's Unearthed Arcana.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 8117390, member: 6777737"] Because they're even stupider. Have you read the class recently? It's quite unplayable. They essentially can't use missile weapons. "Weapons that deal out damage at a distance (including pole arms, missile weapons, and the two-handed sword) call into question the cavalier’s personal bravery, and as such are avoided by all except the most powerful of cavaliers. The cavalier may use these questionable weapons at normal non-proficiency penalties, but their use may violate the character’s chivalric code." You can't even get [I]proficient[/I] in a bow until like 18th level! Their code of behavior is far, far more rigid. The code of behavior is not like the Paladin's "be just and good". It's "be a massive prick and a self-righteous, noble-born jerk." Check out the code. I've bolded all the ones that frequently cause party conflict and which didn't exist in the original Paladin: [excerpt] The code for a feudal campaign may be summed up as follows. The DM may adjust this code to fit his or her own campaign. [LIST] [*]Noble service cheerfully rendered [*]Defense of any charge unto death [*]Courage and enterprise in obedience to rule [*]Respect for all peers and equals [*]Honor to all above your station [*][B]Obedience and respect from all beneath your station[/B] [*][B]Scorn for those who are lowly and ignoble (this includes knightly limitations on weapons and armor)[/B] [*]Military prowess exercised in service to your lord [*]Courtesy to all ladies (if the cavalier is male) [*][B]War is the flowering of chivalry[/B] [*][B]Battle is the test of manhood[/B] [*][B]Combat is glory[/B] [*][B]Personal glory above all in battle[/B] [*][B]Death to all who oppose the cause[/B] [*][B]Death before dishonor[/B] [/LIST] In enforcing this code, the DM may reduce or eliminate experience that is gained by the cavalier if its gaining violates the spirit or letter of the code. A cavalier who retreats from battle, even to save fellow party members, would receive half experience for the beasts slain in his or her retreat. Similarly, a cavalier who dons leather armor to infiltrate a thieves guild to effect a rescue will gain no experience, since the rescue would be done in means not approved of by the code. Note that even neutral and evil cavaliers are bound by this code, but in their cases the obedience is to non-good masters. [/excerpt] That first one, "obedience and respect from all beneath your station," is kind of a significant issue. Since the class all but requires you to be noble-born and highly favored, [I]everyone else in the party[/I] is going to be beneath your station! And their limitation in battle is even worse (again, with the problematic bits bolded): [excerpt] As a result of the code and desire for battle, [B]cavaliers cannot be controlled in battle situations[/B]. [B]They will charge any enemy in sight[/B], with the following order of preference: [LIST=1] [*]Powerful monsters (dragons, demons, giants, etc.) serving enemy leaders, then the leaders themselves. [*]Opponent cavaliers of great renown, enemy flags and standards. [*]Opponent cavalry of noble or elite status [*]Other opponent cavalry [*]Opponent elite footmen [*]Opponent camp and headquarters [*]Opponent melee troops [*]Levies or peasants [/LIST] The cavalier’s charge will be made at full speed, regardless of army cohesion, [B]intervening friendly troops[/B], or other such considerations. [/excerpt] That last line is particularly irritating because cavaliers like to use warhorses and lances. I honestly don't see how anyone could possibly play this class as written. All excerpts are from the class description in 1e's Unearthed Arcana. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which Edition Had the Best Ranger?
Top