Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Darth K'Trava" data-source="post: 1631413" data-attributes="member: 20587">Myself, personally, I started around 1999-2000 with 3.0 when it first came out. We switched over to 3.5 although I do have a few nitpicks with stuff in it...My first character was a halfling(!) paladin that the DM had created. He'd created a stack of characters. I had no clue as to how to play paladins but he wasn't as stringent on that code of theirs as one DM I have now can/will be. Next character was a half-elf ranger (still play him!). Then moved onto playing clerics about a year ago. My most fun character was a cleric! A friend of mine's first 3.0 character was a cleric that he brought back about a year ago when another cleric he was playing got killed..... The first one gets about as much respect now as he did then (none!). Poor guy's the target of quite alot of jokes.....&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Darth K'Trava, post: 1631413, member: 20587"] Myself, personally, I started around 1999-2000 with 3.0 when it first came out. We switched over to 3.5 although I do have a few nitpicks with stuff in it... My first character was a halfling(!) paladin that the DM had created. He'd created a stack of characters. I had no clue as to how to play paladins but he wasn't as stringent on that code of theirs as one DM I have now can/will be. Next character was a half-elf ranger (still play him!). Then moved onto playing clerics about a year ago. My most fun character was a cleric! A friend of mine's first 3.0 character was a cleric that he brought back about a year ago when another cleric he was playing got killed..... The first one gets about as much respect now as he did then (none!). Poor guy's the target of quite alot of jokes..... :lol: [/QUOTE]

Verification