Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which is better? Quick Maths help request
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaelommiss" data-source="post: 7525853" data-attributes="member: 6775925"><p>It depends on the DC you're up against. For up to a DC of 14 you're better with +12. From 15-23 you're better off with +8 and advantage. For 24 and up +12 is better again.</p><p></p><p>You can see this in action <a href="https://anydice.com/program/125ca" target="_blank">here</a>. Select Graph for View, and At Least for Data. The x-axis is the DC. The y-axis is the probability of hitting that DC. The higher the line at any one place along the x-axis, the greater the probability of hitting that DC.</p><p></p><p>In practice they are both going to be very similar. +12 has a mean result of 22.5. +8 with adv. has a mean result of 21.82. Having advantage reduces standard deviation, which is fancy talk for saying that the most likely result occurs in a smaller range. Specifically, results from 1-5 on the d20 become significantly less likely, and higher results become increasingly more likely. The difference between the probabilities of hitting any given DC is less than 10% all the way up to DC 25.</p><p></p><p>From a DM design perspective, I would rather give the player +12 than permanent advantage. This allows the DM to apply adv/dis as is appropriate to the situation. The DM could adjust and give the player a numerical bonus or penalty for the situation, but it's more work than using the default advantage system.</p><p></p><p>Looking forward, if the character's proficiency bonus increases by 1 then the situation changes to +14 vs +9 w/ adv. In this case having +14 beats +9 w/ adv. for every single DC from 15 to 34. At the closest, +9 w/ adv. gets to 0.25% for a DC of 21. It is increasingly worse the further you get from that DC. Except at the fringes it's still fairly close, but this is a situation that will be amplified with every increase in proficiency bonus. For every +1 to proficiency bonus, the character with expertise will increase their mean result by 2, whereas someone with adv. but not expertise will increase their mean by one. The character with expertise will also increase the minimum and maximum results they can achieve faster than the character without. Using adv. instead of expertise could preserve bounded accuracy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaelommiss, post: 7525853, member: 6775925"] It depends on the DC you're up against. For up to a DC of 14 you're better with +12. From 15-23 you're better off with +8 and advantage. For 24 and up +12 is better again. You can see this in action [URL="https://anydice.com/program/125ca"]here[/URL]. Select Graph for View, and At Least for Data. The x-axis is the DC. The y-axis is the probability of hitting that DC. The higher the line at any one place along the x-axis, the greater the probability of hitting that DC. In practice they are both going to be very similar. +12 has a mean result of 22.5. +8 with adv. has a mean result of 21.82. Having advantage reduces standard deviation, which is fancy talk for saying that the most likely result occurs in a smaller range. Specifically, results from 1-5 on the d20 become significantly less likely, and higher results become increasingly more likely. The difference between the probabilities of hitting any given DC is less than 10% all the way up to DC 25. From a DM design perspective, I would rather give the player +12 than permanent advantage. This allows the DM to apply adv/dis as is appropriate to the situation. The DM could adjust and give the player a numerical bonus or penalty for the situation, but it's more work than using the default advantage system. Looking forward, if the character's proficiency bonus increases by 1 then the situation changes to +14 vs +9 w/ adv. In this case having +14 beats +9 w/ adv. for every single DC from 15 to 34. At the closest, +9 w/ adv. gets to 0.25% for a DC of 21. It is increasingly worse the further you get from that DC. Except at the fringes it's still fairly close, but this is a situation that will be amplified with every increase in proficiency bonus. For every +1 to proficiency bonus, the character with expertise will increase their mean result by 2, whereas someone with adv. but not expertise will increase their mean by one. The character with expertise will also increase the minimum and maximum results they can achieve faster than the character without. Using adv. instead of expertise could preserve bounded accuracy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which is better? Quick Maths help request
Top