Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 7871691" data-attributes="member: 4348">I dislike the bounded accuracy concept in it's limiting of Fighters to hit better, but 5e's willingness to let it be broken easily by Rogue's Expertise or certain spells from Clerics or Wizards.&nbsp; If they equally applied it better, or gave Fighters something akin to Expertise with weapons, I'd like it better.On the otherhand, while I like that PF2e has a greater advancement and no bounded accuracy, the entire feats thing is too much.&nbsp; It feels more like they are restricting what I can do with their class abilities rather than allowing me to do things.&nbsp; It feels a LOT more restrictive than other games while at the same time giving me FAR MORE to keep track of.In the balance of the two, I'd choose AD&amp;D...but as that is not an option, I'll go with 5e.&nbsp; Better something with unequally applied Bounded accuracy than a more restrictive allowance of actions based on a Feat system for everything.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 7871691, member: 4348"] I dislike the bounded accuracy concept in it's limiting of Fighters to hit better, but 5e's willingness to let it be broken easily by Rogue's Expertise or certain spells from Clerics or Wizards. If they equally applied it better, or gave Fighters something akin to Expertise with weapons, I'd like it better. On the otherhand, while I like that PF2e has a greater advancement and no bounded accuracy, the entire feats thing is too much. It feels more like they are restricting what I can do with their class abilities rather than allowing me to do things. It feels a LOT more restrictive than other games while at the same time giving me FAR MORE to keep track of. In the balance of the two, I'd choose AD&D...but as that is not an option, I'll go with 5e. Better something with unequally applied Bounded accuracy than a more restrictive allowance of actions based on a Feat system for everything. [/QUOTE]

Verification